I want answers to these questions! (And LOTS of others too)

Since the Democrats are probably going to win at least one house of congress. It is time to be asking for answers to a lot of questions. Regarding Iraq, 9/11, Spying on americans, Cronyism, the state of the economy... The list is huge. But the five mentioned in this article in AlterNet are a good start.

If we don't get straight answers to these hard questions soon, it will be time to salute the flag once more, then line up for the fitting of the slave collars.

1. Who really lost Iraq?

2. Who blew 9/11?

3. How wide is the domestic surveillance net?

4. Is Big Oil pulling an Enron?

5. Who's making money off your retirement?

BONUS Question: Grounds for impeachment?

Congressional investigators digging into the aforementioned questions cannot ignore the possibility of impeachment proceedings against Vice President Cheney, who figures prominently in almost every one of the scandals engulfing the administration. It was Cheney who ran the government's response to the 9/11 attacks without constitutional authority, at one point ordering shoot-downs of commercial planes and what would turn out to be a medevac helicopter; who led the secret meetings of administration officials and oilmen to set energy policy; who allowed Ahmed Chalabi to play the U.S. government like a violin; who very well may be the origin of the whisper campaign that culminated in the Plame leak; and, of course, it was Cheney's former employer (and source of continuing deferred compensation paychecks) that benefited enormously from no-bid contracts in Iraq. Judicial Watch, the conservative legal outfit in Washington, has unearthed an email dated March 5, 2003, sent by an Army Corps of Engineers official whose name had been blacked out, that said of a pending deal under which Halliburton would rebuild the Iraqi oil industry, "We anticipate no issue since the action has been coordinated w VP's office." There's plenty more where that came from; whether any of Cheney's actions constitute "high crimes and misdemeanors" is for Congress, and the nation, to debate.

Read more here