Tuesday, October 31, 2006

About our adolescent president...

Maha at Mahablog:
We’ve all suspected from the beginning that it’s Daddy Dick who makes the real decisions, or at least presents to the President the decisions Dick thinks George should make. Meanwhile, the President surrounds himself with Mommies — Karen Hughes, Condi Rice, Harriet Miers.

But, conversely again, George Bush doesn’t like to be supervised. He really, really, doesn’t like to be supervised, or even to compromise, or to make his decisions vulnerable to public and congressional scrutiny. “The Bush White House has had no relationship with Congress,” said a Bush ally. Instead of working with Congress to govern the nation, Bush goes behind their backs and attaches signing statements to the laws he signs, declaring what he will and will not do.

He acts like a teenager who is afraid to ask Dad for the car keys, so he waits until Dad is asleep and takes them without asking.

More

Bushco - $till '$upporting' our troops

Christy Hardin Smith - FireDogLake

What would you say if I told you that American soldiers were being knowingly subjected to unclean water, that the Pentagon and Halliburton, the contractor in charge of delivery of this e.coli and coliform collection, knew this via multiple reports from military doctors who have had to treat our soldiers for contamination issues…and that our troops would have been safer to just dip water out of the Euphrates (where dead bodies float by regularly these days) because the raw river water is less contaminated than what they are being given?

What if I told you that the Republican controlled House and Senate have not even bothered to have an oversight hearing on this issue — not one – because maintaining their rose-colored glasses illusion is more important than keeping our troops safe?

Nothing like our troops brushing their teeth in non-potable water day in and day out as a morale booster, I always say, because it's so easy to keep an eye out for IEDs and ambushes and a steady hand on the machine gun when you are doubled over with intestinal pain. Jeebus, what is wrong with these people?!? As if our soldiers don't have enough to deal with as it is in Iraq, an American company with the complicity of the GOP leadership of Congress and Rummy's Pentagon do nothing to clean up this water mess because, clearly, water would be of no real value while our soldiers are serving in the desert.

And who still gets checks from Halliburton?

More

Allen's actions provide a response pattern for the rest of us.

The following is a letter to NBC29 from Mike Stark, the man who was tackled for a comment he made at Senator Allen's campaign stop in Charlottesville on Tuesday.

My name is Mike Stark. I am a law student at the University of Virginia, a marine, and a citizen journalist. Earlier today at a public event, I was attempting to ask Senator Allen a question about his sealed divorce record and his arrest in the 1970s, both of which are in the public domain. His people assaulted me, put me in a headlock, and wrestled me to the ground. Video footage is available here, from an NBC affiliate.

[...]

George Allen, at any time, could have stopped the fray. All he had to do was say, "This is not how my campaign is run. Take your hands off that man." He could have ignored my questions. Instead he and his thugs chose violence. I spent four years in the Marine Corps. I'll be damned if I'll let my country be taken from me by thugs that are afraid of taking responsibility for themselves.

It just isn't the America I know and love. Somebody needs to take a stand against those that would bully and intimidate their fellow citizens. That stand begins right here, right now.

W. Michael Stark

Read the entire letter

More about the fray Here


You need to go to Ice Station Tango.

Something's Rotten in the Pumpkin Patch

by Jump to the Left
of the Unruly Mob @ LesEnrages.Org

Once upon a time, there was a pumpkin patch. The pumpkins were foolish, and allowed a very bad ruler to come to power:

Go, you'll like it.

Two Terrifying Tales!!!

Chris Weigant at Huffington

Horror for Democrats.
...Ken Mehlman defends the accuracy of the vote, saying, "San Francisco was kind of a surprise, voting out Nancy Pelosi and overwhelmingly going for write-in candidate Pat Robertson, but the will of the voters must be respected." He also points out that some districts served by Sequoia voting machines actually voted strongly for seceding from the United States and joining Venezuela, asking, "Why aren't Democrats questioning those results?"

[...]

[CUE: dark closeup of desk with plaque reading "Karl Rove;" sound of insanely evil laughter, followed by minor-key dirge-like organ music.]

...the Republicans retain control of the Senate!

And Horror for Republicans.

The votes are cast, and carefully counted.

Democrats wake up the day after the election in control of both houses of Congress. Nancy Pelosi becomes the first female Speaker of the House.

[I really should just stop here -- as that alone is horrifying enough for the GOP!]

[...]

Massive corruption is uncovered, reaching all the way to the top. Massive war profiteering is exposed. The filth is so blatant and repulsive that even Republicans are shamed and embarrassed by it.

To show they are not connected with the scandal (and grasping at any straw which could get them re-elected), some Republicans call for impeachment. Speaker Pelosi reluctantly agrees (taking time out from her hectic schedule of passing laws to: mandate forced gay marriage for any single male over the age of 30; introduce sex-ed classes in kindergarten, complete with free condoms; and guarantee Social Security benefits to all illegal aliens, including Osama Bin Laden -- should he decide to move here), and backs down on her pre-election promise not to hold impeachment hearings.

[...]

The Senate holds a trial, and then promptly votes 70-30 to remove Bush and Cheney from office at the same time. They are subsequently frogmarched out of the White House in handcuffs, and handed over to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, where they face war crimes trials.

Since both are removed simultaneously, there is no one left to appoint their successors. This means...

[CUE: sound of terrified shrieking woman, and spooky chains clanking.]

...Nancy Pelosi (being third in the line of succession) becomes President Pelosi for the next two years!

Read the whole post, IF YOU DARE!!!

From the Republicans Contract With America - "Throw us out"!

Nicole Belle at Crooks and Liars:

[..]The Contract itself emerged publicly with the staging of the mass signing of the Contract on the steps of the U.S. Capitol by 367 candidates for office on September 27, 1994. On that day, all of these candidates publicly pledged: "If we break this Contract, throw us out." The Republicans who were already Members of the House of Representatives organized themselves into 11 working groups that eventually drafted ten bills that made up the Contract.

There you go, folks. Straight from the horse…er, the elephants' mouths. Throw them out.

More

U.K. report: Warming will damage economy

No longer the lap poodle, at least in global warming.

Thomas Wagner, Associated Press Writer:

The British government also hired former Vice President Al Gore, who has emerged as a powerful environmental spokesman since losing the 2000 presidential election, to advise it on climate change — a clear indication of Prime Minister Tony Blair's growing dissatisfaction with U.S. environmental policy.

The 700-page report argues that environmentalism and economic growth can go hand in hand in the battle against global warming. But it also says that if no action is taken, rising sea levels, heavier floods and more intense droughts could displace 200 million people by the middle of the century.

The report said unabated climate change would eventually cost the equivalent of between 5 percent and 20 percent of global gross domestic product each year. The report by Sir Nicholas Stern, a senior government economist, represents a huge contrast to the U.S. government's wait-and-see policies.

Blair called for "bold and decisive action" to cut carbon emissions and stem the worst of the temperature rise.

More

Economic disaster due to Repub spending is hiding in the wings. What was that about financial restraint?

Matt Crenson at AP:

David M. Walker sure talks like he's running for office. "This is about the future of our country, our kids and grandkids," the comptroller general of the United States warns a packed hall at Austin's historic Driskill Hotel. "We the people have to rise up to make sure things get changed."

But Walker doesn't want, or need, your vote this November. He already has a job as head of the Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress that audits and evaluates the performance of the federal government.

[...]

From the hustings and the airwaves this campaign season, America's political class can be heard debating Capitol Hill sex scandals, the wisdom of the war in Iraq and which party is tougher on terror. Democrats and Republicans talk of cutting taxes to make life easier for the American people.

What they don't talk about is a dirty little secret everyone in Washington knows, or at least should. The vast majority of economists and budget analysts agree: The ship of state is on a disastrous course, and will founder on the reefs of economic disaster if nothing is done to correct it.

Much more





2 + 2 = Iraq is lost.


Here's some simple arithmetic: "Our son Jeff is a Captain in the Air Force. He is about to start his fourth rotation in Iraq." (Read his parents' story.)

Now here's Paul Krugman's "The Arithmetic of Failure," in today's New York Times:

Iraq is a lost cause. It’s just a matter of arithmetic: given the violence of the environment, with ethnic groups and rival militias at each other’s throats, American forces there are large enough to suffer terrible losses, but far too small to stabilize the country.

We’re so undermanned that we’re even losing our ability to influence events: earlier this week, Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki brusquely rejected American efforts to set a timetable for reining in the militias.

[...]

It’s hard to believe that the world’s only superpower is on the verge of losing not just one but two wars. But the arithmetic of stability operations suggests that unless we give up our futile efforts in Iraq, we’re on track to do just that.

More here

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld. Derelict in their duty.

Christy Hardin Smith at FireDogLake:
With one hundred US soldiers killed in Iraq this month alone and counting, how many of those deaths came with a bullet or a bomb put together with US ammo that we never bothered to track or account for once we handed it over to an Iraqi police and military force that we knew was rife with insurgents?

The answers came Sunday from the inspector general’s office, which found major discrepancies in American military records on where thousands of 9-millimeter pistols and hundreds of assault rifles and other weapons have ended up. The American military did not even take the elementary step of recording the serial numbers of nearly half a million weapons provided to Iraqis, the inspector general found, making it impossible to track or identify any that might be in the wrong hands.[...]

Isn't it time that George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld and all of the rubber stamp Republicans in Congress were held accountable for their utter dereliction of duty? For the sake of every American soldier who is still fighting in Iraq…isn't it time?

More

Monday, October 30, 2006

Vote on paper ballots! The Vote shifting has already begun.

Amy Goldstein at the Washington Post:

Two weeks before the midterm elections, at least 10 states, including Maryland, remain ripe for voting problems, according to a study released yesterday by a nonpartisan clearinghouse that tracks electoral reforms across the United States.

The report by Electionline.org says those states, and possibly others, could encounter trouble on Election Day because they have a combustible mix of fledgling voting-machine technology, confusion over voting procedures or recent litigation over election rules -- and close races.

The report cautions that the Nov. 7 elections, which will determine which political party controls the House and Senate, promise "to bring more of what voters have come to expect since the 2000 elections -- a divided body politic, an election system in flux and the possibility -- if not certainty -- of problems at polls nationwide."



More

Dick Cheney is right.

But that's no credit to him.

R. J. Eskow at Huffington:

There's no question about it. Dick Cheney is absolutely right when he says that terrorists are "very much aware of our political calendar here." After all, Cheney would not be Vice President today had Bin Laden not issued his video shout-out to the America people in 2004 .

Under the Republicans, Iraq has become a combination job fair and training ground for the terrorist networks.

The policies of this Republican Administration have been a bonanza for the bad guys.

[...]

The report card is in on Republicans and America's safety, and they get an "F."
Read on

From Slashdot:Bush Signs Bill Enabling Martial Law

Updated:
Frank Morales - Signs of the Times:
In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions.
Continue Sign of the Times


From Slashdot:
An anonymous reader writes to point us to an article on the meaning of a new law that President Bush signed on Oct. 17. It seems to allow the President to impose martial law on any state or territory, using federal troops and/or the state's own, or other states', National Guard troops. From the article:

"In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law. It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President's
ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his is seeking to undo those prohibitions."


More

You know how Shrub says that his strategy is based on what he hears from the military leaders on the ground?

So... what do you think about this?

Larry Johnson at No Quarter:

From Mark Shields on PBS's Newshour, via ThinkProgress:

President Bush has consistently said that his strategy in Iraq is dictated by military officials on the ground. Last night on the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, columnist Mark Shields revealed that one of the “highest ranking men” in the military has recommended removing all U.S. troops from Baghdad. Here’s the key excerpt:
MARK SHIELDS: The highest ranking or certainly one of the highest ranking men in the United States military today has recommended that we remove all troops from Baghdad, all American troops from Baghdad…All of the troops out of Baghdad, secure the road to the airport, secure the oil fields and the borders, and say that the pacification and the maintaining of order in Baghdad is the responsibility of the Iraqis. That is the recommendation of probably one of the most — probably the most respected man in uniform today.
Continue

Sunday, October 29, 2006

From Huffington:Why Bush Smirks.

Leonard Shalin - Huffington Post:

In observing our president's expressions over the years, I became aware of a feature of George Bush's face that revealed more about his inner self than anything issuing forth from his mouth. President Bush has a disconnect between the right side and the left side of his face. While the right side of his mouth and the corner of his right eyes portray a smile, the left side of his mouth and the corners of his left eye convey a scowl.

The result is a twisted smirk that has become his trademark expression.

[...]

Psychologists have studied the phenomenon of the split face for many years and have accumulated a reservoir of studies that conclusively indicate that the expression of the left side of an individual's face is far more revealing concerning their emotional state than is their whole face.

Read the post

How do you explain when God sends you into a 'Holy War'... And you lose it.

Keninny at DownWithTyranny:


"There is a particular danger with a war that God commands. What if God should lose?

"--Garry Wills, in "A Country Ruled by Faith," in the new (Nov. 16) New York Review of Books"That is unthinkable to the evangelicals,"

Wills continues. "They cannot accept the idea of second-guessing God, and he was the one who led them into war. Thus, in 2006, when two thirds of the American people told pollsters that the war in Iraq was a mistake, the third of those still standing behind it were mainly evangelicals (who make up about one third of the population). It was a faith-based certitude."
Read the post

Republican "People of the Lie" must disgorge the Abu Ghraib child rape photos, videos, Judge rules

lambert at Corrente:

As the Bush administration in the person of Dick “Dick” Cheney yet again uses its standard technique of conveying, through nods and winks, that torture is A Good Thing, and winger operatives helpfully explain the technique to any “young professionals” who want to follow along at home, the horror—Well, let’s just go ahead and use the right word, even if it sounds Shrillevil done at Abu Ghraib will live on after us for a long, long time. Greg Mitchell:

[US District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein] ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America’s image. Last year a Republican senator conceded that they contained scenes of “rape and murder” and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said they included acts that were “blatantly sadistic.”

[...]

Gee, I don’t remember any Abu Ghraib prosecutions or convictions for rape and murder. And you’d think, with videotaped evidence, convictions would be pretty easy to get. Readers, am I having a senior moment, or did the rapists and murderers skate?

The ACLU has sought the release of 87 photographs and four videotapes taken at the prison as part of an October 2003 lawsuit demanding information on the treatment of detainees in U.S. custody and the transfer of prisoners to countries known to use torture.

[...]

The photos were among thousands turned over by the key “whistleblower” in the scandal, Specialist Joseph M. Darby. Just a few that were released to the press sparked the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal last year, and the video images are said to be even more shocking.

Videos, eh? Those must be the unreleased tapes of screaming boys being raped that Seymour Hersh heard. Heh, indeedy:

In the same period, reporter Seymour Hersh, who helped uncover the scandal, said in a speech before an ACLU convention: “Some of the worse that happened that you don’t know about, ok? Videos, there are women there. Some of you may have read they were passing letters, communications out to their men … . The women were passing messages saying ‘Please come and kill me, because of what’s happened.’

“Basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys/children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. The worst about all of them is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror it’s going to come out.”

Some “sex ring”, right Senator Shays?

These are not just little ol’ war crimes. This isn’t about Republican pedophiles who are Bush family friends. This isn’t a your typical Republican authoritarian sex scandal. This isn’t gay hookers with White House passes throwing Bush softballs at pressers. We’re talking rape and murder, captured on video.

Continue reading

Do you remember the fleet in the Persian Gulf? They're now guarding against an Al-Qaeda attack.

Update below

Steven D at Booman Tribune:

Reports from Reuters today claim American and British naval forces have been deployed to protect Saudi Arabian and Bahraini oil facilities against a possible terrorist strike from Al Qaeda:


[...]

Note the timing. This alleged terrorist threat came last month. The Saudi security advisor as much as said all it amounted to was a generic claim by Al Qaeda, made on September 11th this year, to "target economic interests in the Gulf." Yet, today, a statement is issued by British Royal Navy that American and British naval forces have been deployed to counter specific threats to Saudi Arabia's Ras Tanura terminal, and Bahrain's Bapco refinery.


So who's telling the truth: the spokesperson for the Saudis or the Royal Navy? And do the upcoming US elections have anything to do with the Royal Navy's statement regarding this alarming, and previously undisclosed, terrorist threat to oil supplies from the Persian Gulf?


Read the post

Update:
Jeff Huber at Pen and Sword:

I'm not yet convinced that a war with Iran or Korea is inevitable, but I don't dismiss the possibility that at the highest levels of the White House, such wars are already a done deal.

Daniel Ellsburg is among the latest high profile political figures to suggest that we may soon see a replay of the Tonkin Gulf incident. Ellsburg is the former State Department official who "leaked" the so-called Pentagon Papers to the New York Times in 1971. Among other things, the Papers implied that LBJ used exaggerated reports of engagements in the Tonkin Gulf between U.S. and North Vietnamese naval forces to justify pre-planned expansion of air and ground operations in Vietnam. Ellsburg and others fear that the current U.S. naval "build up" in the Arabian Gulf region could produce a déjà vu all over again situation. I think that's entirely too possible, and am also concerned that the same sort of thing could happen with North Korea.
Read

The polls are predicting a Democrat landslide. So, how will the election be stolen?

jpol at Booman Tribune:
I titled this post: "A Democratic Romp; Or a Stolen Election?" By way of a postscript allow me to point out another AP/Ipsos poll released last week but almost totally ignored by the mainstream media. That poll interviewed 1,000 adults in each of nine countries including the United States and asked: "How confident are you that votes in [the United States] elections are counted accurately?" The findings for residents of the United States are extremely interesting:
Very confident: 26 percent
Somewhat confident: 40 percent
Not very confident: 20 percent
Not at all confident: 14
percent

The actual poll is hidden behind a subscription wall, but of the 9 countries surveyed (Canada, France, Italy, Germany, Mexico, South Korea, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States), only Italians expressed less confidence in the integrity of the vote count than Americans.

Read the Post

Saturday, October 28, 2006

Check out this site

This comes under the multitalent catagory. This is not to be an advertisement. (unless you, like me are intrested in astronomy and cosmology)
The point is notice that one of the authors of this book is none other than Queen guitarist Brian May.

Posted to the Gentle Giant email list
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:15:22 -0600
From: "Dan L"
Subject: nogg: Queen's Brian May goes back to space

Glad to see he's been keeping busy.
Dan L

"Bang! The Complete History of the Universe"

Superstar Brian completed his opus as part of a new band, working with astronomy legend Sir Patrick Moore and fellow Sky At Night presenter Chris Lintott.

But the musician has certainly not been brought in simply to lend the power of being a pop star to marketing of the book. Instead he is himself a much respected astronomer who gave up PhD research into the distribution of dust in the solar system in the Seventies when Queen hit the big time.

Brian clearly sees Bang! as a project at least as important as any new album. In fact he has been banging on about it regularly at his own website.

Last week, as he explains himself, he turned down an invitation to jam with Meat Loaf at the Royal Albert Hall because he had been so busy promoting the book. Interviews had left perfectionist Brian no time to do a sound check, so he sat back and enjoyed the concert instead.

Bang! has its own well-constructed website, complete with a suitably dramatic theme tune by Brian. He has also written an introduction on the site where he stresses: "Bang! is written in English, rather than the language of mathematics, designed to be clear to anyone not previously deeply immersed in astronomy, but with an appetite for understanding."
------------------------------"
BANG! - The Complete History of the Universe

Sorry... I've been snowed under

In my day job my co-worker has left to get married... So I'm a one man act for a while. And the last few days have passed in a daze.
I've had two jobs that should have taken a week to do in two days. So I've had my head down.
I will try to get some posts up later tonight...

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Very sobering article on Global Warming - Please Read

This post points to a larger article at Salon. Read them both. Then consider your vote.

Salon has an article today, Calculating the global warming catastrophe, that I recommend everyone read. This is the most important subject. It is vastly more important than our election, except that our election offers a way to start doing something about the problem. We only have a few years to turn things around. (To see it I had to watch an ad for a car that doesn't get good fuel economy...)

HOW serious is the problem? The article quotes one scientist who says it is already too late and makes a dramatic worst-case prediction,

Human beings, a hardy species, will not perish entirely, he says; in interviews during his book tour, Lovelock has predicted that about 200 million people, or about one thirtieth of the current world population, will survive if competent leaders make a new home for us near the present-day Arctic. There may also be other survivable spots, like the British Isles, though he notes that rising sea levels will render them more an archipelago. In any event, he predicts that "teeming billions" will perish.
Others, however, say that we are heading that way, BUT we still have 10 years to turn it around.
More of this post

Go! Rush Go!

Billmon at The Whiskey Bar:

I don't know where Limbaugh got the idea that telling scurrilous lies about one of America's favorite celebrities [Michael Fox]-- and someone who enjoys a huge amount of public sympathy to boot -- was a shrewd political move. But the Dems should be damned glad he did. Considering how razor-close the Missouri race appears to be, Rush may have just single-handedly booted away a Republican Senate seat.

Go Rush! Go!

Read the entire post

The power grab has begun in ernest.

The Existentialist Cowboy:

Bush administration violates the separation of powers, issues fiat robbing court of judicial power

Bush seems to be scrambling to consolidate dictatorial powers before his administration comes crashing down around him. According to the Washington Post, Bush has moved to implement the recent bill that abrogates habeas corpus, authorizing military trials of so-called "enemy combatants". The US District Court in Washington has been summarily notified that it no longer has jurisdiction in such cases and may no longer consider "... hundreds of habeas corpus petitions filed by inmates at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba."

[...]

Bush's move may put the US in unchartered waters. Clearly —the bill demanded by Bush and duly passed by the obeisant Congress is unconstitutional on its face. Even the stodgy Wall Street Journal said that the law was "... a stinging rebuke to the Supreme Court", stripping the courts of all jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus claims filed by so-called "enemy combatants" anywhere in the world.
Read more

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Here is yet another way the GOP will screw us over and continue the march to a one party empire.

James H. Webb's name is too long to fit, but George F. Allen, will have his full name displayed...
Isn't that special? I wonder what the Rs would be saying if the roles were reversed? But, you know of course, that would never happen, would it?

What kind of mess have we gotten ourselves into? And more important what are we going to do about it?

From the Washington Post:

U.S. Senate candidate James Webb's last name has been cut off on part of the electronic ballot used by voters in Alexandria, Falls Church and Charlottesville because of a computer glitch that also affects other candidates with long names, city officials said yesterday.

Although the problem creates some voter confusion, it will not cause votes to be cast incorrectly, election officials emphasized. The error shows up only on the summary page, where voters are asked to review their selections before hitting the button to cast their votes. Webb's full name appears on the page where voters choose for whom to vote.

[...]

Every candidate on Alexandria's summary page has been affected in some way by the glitch. Even if candidates' full names appear, as is the case with Webb's Republican opponent, incumbent Sen. George F. Allen, their party affiliations have been cut off.

Jean Jensen, secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections, who said yesterday she only recently became aware of the problem, pledged to have it fixed by the 2007 statewide elections.

More from Taylor Marsh at Huffington




The pResident who "Is gonna pertek you from nukular terrorism" was rooting for North Korea to detonate a nuke.

From the Progress Report:
NORTH KOREA -- BUSH ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS SECRETLY ROOTED FOR NUKE TEST: Weeks before North Korea announced it had detonated a nuclear device, senior Bush administration officials were "quietly rooting for a test, believing that would finally clarify the debate within the administration," the Washington Post reported Sunday. According to the Post, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has "come close to saying the test was a net plus for the United States," spurring China to be more assertive and helping to push through the unanimous U.N. Security Council resolution condemning North Korea.


Read on...

Don't you feel the Luv?

Monday, October 23, 2006

LULLA-BYE TO FREE SPEECH

From the Olive Ream:
Hush, little blogger, don't say a word,
It's best you become part of the mindless herd.
And if you feel the need for a political rant,
Mama's going to recommend you keep it scant.
And if you continue to question authority,
DHS will consider your unlawful captivity.
And if this warning won't keep you mum,
Government's going to classify you a terrorist scum.
And if you still think your speech is free,
Try selling 9-11 as a conspiracy.
Your NSA file will have an "enemy combatant" stamp,
And soon you'll be heading off to a detention camp.
So if you know what's good for you,
Keep your posts in check and your attitude too.
Now shut your mouth and watch Fox News,
Enjoy your IQ drop and let it be your muse.

OK, So What Happens if the Election Results Are "Skewed"?

Clammyc at Booman Tribune:
In all seriousness, I have been asking myself that very question for a few months now. And since this issue has been getting more and more press lately, (in addition to the phenomenal compilation done with respect to the 2004 election "irregularities"), I wanted to gauge the thought process, the general feeling, the potential reaction that is necessary, warranted, required, feasible, etc. if we have a repeat of 2000, 2002 or 2004.

[...]

There are so many questions to be asked - there are so many variables to consider, but to not have any thoughts as to what the reaction would be if we wake up on November 8 and find that double digit leads have mysteriously vanished overnight, or that exit polls were "so far off" because republicans didn't want to say that they voted the way they did, or that voting machines were "selectively available", or whatever else can happen on November 7 (and even afterwards with the counting of the absentee ballots, etc.) would be a bit shortsighted.

Read on...

Olbermann - Withering!!!

Crooks and Liars:
Keith issued arguably his most powerful Special Comment yet tonight. This time he takes on the GOP's newest fearmongering ad which quotes Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri superimposed over pictures of explosions with the sound of a ticking bomb in the background. As if that wasn't enough, it's topped off with the cryptic message echoing LBJ's 1960 "Daisy" ad that ran just once: These are the stakes.

Video-WMP Video-QT (The QT has to load first before you can view it. Please be patient. I'm working on getting it to stream shortly)

In my opinion, the most important point Keith makes concerns the recent uproar over the video CNN showed this week of a sniper attack on US troops in Iraq. House Armed Services Chairman Duncan Hunter and Congressman Brian Bilbray have come out strong against it calling it a "terrorist snuff film" yet they seem to have no problem with a RNC ad which is really nothing short of a terrorist propaganda film itself.

Transcript of the commentary. (It's incandescent!)
Bin Laden puts out what amounts to a commercial of fear; The Republicans put out what is unmistakable as a commercial of fear.

The Republicans are paying to have the messages of bin Laden and the others broadcast into your home.

Only the Republicans have a bigger bank roll.

When, last week, the CNN network ran video of an insurgent in Iraq, evidently stalking and killing an American soldier, the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Mr. Hunter, Republican of California, branded that channel, quote, “the publicist for an enemy propaganda film” and that CNN used it “to sell commercials.”

Another California Republican, Rep. Brian Bilbray, called the video “nothing short of a terrorist snuff film.”

If so, Mr. Bilbray, then what in the hell is your Party’s new advertisement?

Read on...

But Don't Despair

About all we can do is laugh in their faces.

IOZ:
First let me say: It’s good to be angry. It’s good to be worried. It’s good to be afraid. But it gains nothing to despair. We’re neither the first nor the last people on earth to be ruled rather than governed. We’re neither the first nor the last to consign our fate to the whims of madmen and murderers. American exceptionalism afflicts those of us who propose to defend an ideal—and idealized—Republic as much as it afflicts those who’ve recently driven the nails into its wrists and the spear into its side. We’re neither the first nor the last people on earth to be ruled by an egomaniacal moron. If our chapter is a sad one, it’s still just a chapter. (“A comma,” the dauphin might put it in other circumstances.)
More...

More on the Bush land deal in Paraguay

Wonkette:

We Hate To Bring Up the Nazis, But They Fled To South America, Too

Our paranoid friends over at Bring It On have put together a story that hasn’t exactly made Washington Whispers. It’s real short and real simple:

  • Jenna Bush paid a secret diplomatic visit to Paraguayan President Nicanor Duarte and U.S. Ambassador James Cason. There were no press conferences, no public sightings and no official confirmation of her 10-day trip which apparently ended this week.
  • The Paraguayan Senate voted last summer to “grant U.S. troops immunity from national and International Criminal Court (ICC) jurisdiction.”
  • Immediately afterwards, 500 heavily armed U.S. troops arrived with various planes, choppers and land vehicles at Mariscal Estigarribia air base, which happens to be at the northern tip of Paraguay near the Bolivian/Brazilian border. More have reportedly arrived since then.

What the hell, after the jump. Plus a BREAKING UPDATE involving, of course, The Moonies!

Well, read on! (You know you want to.)

What do computer experts at Computerworld think of Diebold's voting(fraud) machine?

Title of the article at Computerworld:
Diebold's ballot bollocks (and a very very vunny video)


What follows is a series of quotes from several IT experts. Little of it is complementary to Diebold and the electronic vote movement.
A quick example is the quote from John C. Dvorak.
This is [redacted]! So what if it’s an old version. If Diebold and anyone who legitimately has a copy can’t strictly control access, then they might as well publish the software on their website. The people who would do wrong with it will get it somehow anyway. Just one more nail in our coffins as voters in fair elections.
more...

Just another reason to clean house November 7th.

Harry Shearer at Huffington:

I've linked to Chris Rose columns from the Times-Picayune fairly often during the past year. For New Orleanians, Chris has been an amazing journalistic phoenix: an amiable music columnist before the disaster, he became the chronicler of the ironies, lunacies and sadnesses of the city in the wake of the collapse of the federal levees.

He had, we told each other, "found his voice", and nobody from the city could read his columns without laughing and crying in rapid sequence.
Yesterday, Chris told the rest of the story.
More

Sunday, October 22, 2006

Military Takeover of the US?

Go to Google Blog Search, enter these words Army Announces Readiness for Total Military Takeover of America, (I've created a link to that search Here) Below are the first few links I Found.

Go to Google.com, again, enter Army Announces Readiness for Total Military Takeover of America, (Again, I've created a link to that search Here). Not as many links, but what is up?


US Army Announces Readiness for Total Military Takeover of America

Army Announces Readiness for Total Military Takeover of America

US Army Announces Readiness For Total Military Takeover of America

Military Chaff


US Army Announces Readiness for Total Military Takeover of America

Any ideas how the MSM will tell us "Nothing to see here, move along. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..."?

Saturday, October 21, 2006

The polls look good, Bush's approval is in the dumper, the GOP seems in full dissarray, what could go wrong?

This.
From Tom Dispatch:
Like those famed sugar plums, visions of a Democratic House, and even Senate, are dancing in the heads of Party activists; while, for so many other Americans, simple hopes are rising for what the power of Congressional "oversight," the power to investigate, the power of a subpoena, might do to Bush administration dreams of endless domination. But sometimes -- even assuming all this came true -- a little dash of cold history in the face is a salutary thing. So let Greg Grandin, Latin American expert and author of the superb Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism, bring back to life the last time the Democrats found themselves in such a mood. Let him take you back to a previous, scandal-ridden era when another formidable President over-reached himself with off-the-books ventures of every sort.


Read on...

Friday, October 20, 2006

Kevin Tillman on Pat Tillman's Birthday.

Kevin, Pat Tillman's brother, at TruthDig
It is Pat’s birthday on November 6, and elections are the day after. It gets me thinking about a conversation I had with Pat before we joined the military. He spoke about the risks with signing the papers. How once we committed, we were at the mercy of the American leadership and the American people. How we could be thrown in a direction not of our volition. How fighting as a soldier would leave us without a voice… until we get out.

Much has happened since we handed over our voice:

[...]

Somehow the more soldiers that die, the more legitimate the illegal invasion becomes.

Somehow American leadership, whose only credit is lying to its people and illegally invading a nation, has been allowed to steal the courage, virtue and honor of its soldiers on the ground.

Somehow those afraid to fight an illegal invasion decades ago are allowed to send soldiers to die for an illegal invasion they started.

Somehow faking character, virtue and strength is tolerated.

Somehow profiting from tragedy and horror is tolerated.

Somehow the death of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people is tolerated.

Somehow subversion of the Bill of Rights and The Constitution is tolerated.

Somehow suspension of Habeas Corpus is supposed to keep this country safe.

Somehow torture is tolerated.

Somehow lying is tolerated.

Read More

Religious Right in Government guarantees a government of amoral people - John Dean

John Dean at FindLaw
There are two kinds of authoritarians, whom researchers can identify by their answers to certain personality tests. There are people who become leaders in authoritarian movements, and there are their followers. The leaders have stronger drives for personal power and they are also pretty amoral. Compared with most folks, they admit, when answering surveys anonymously, that manipulating others, exploiting the gullible, intimidating, cheating, and being a hypocrite are all justified if they get you what you want. They say one of the best skills a person can develop is the ability to look someone straight in the eye and lie convincingly. They say the world is full of suckers who deserve to be "taken" because they are so stupid. All in all it sounds like the game plan for how Bush won Ohio in the last election.

[...]

Q: So the followers are "suckers" -- so to speak?

A: Well, faith-healers and various enterprising evangelists have been playing them for suckers for a long time. Lately political strategists have seen how rich the takings are, and jumped in. They mobilized the Religious Right, which has become the most potent force in American politics. Its rank and file is very organized, very energetic, very devoted, and earnestly does what it is told by its authoritarian leaders.

Q: You're saying then that, ironically, if the Religious Right has its way, the White House and Congress will be filled with amoral people.

A: Yes, I am, although of course there would be exceptions. And I'd say the proof is already right in front of us. When did we ever have a president who insisted on having the "right" to torture people, or a Congress that voted for it? How often have we had an administration deciding it could suspend habeas corpus and other constitutional guarantees, and Congress going along? And you can see this amorality on the individual level. Look at the members of the House of Representatives who have been convicted of crimes lately. Or look at the list of the 20 most corrupt members of the House compiled by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics. Every one of these lawmakers got high marks for his voting record from the James Dobson/Tony Perkins Family Research Council. That's not a coincidence. There's this remarkable, actually weird but understandable, connection between being corrupt and being elected by the Religious Right. The crooks head for the Religious Right. The gullible rank and file don't realize this. But they send far more than their fair share of bribe-taking, influence peddling, money laundering, lying scoundrels to executive mansions and legislatures election after election."

More...

Thursday, October 19, 2006

"They Voted To Allow Torture"

Garrison Keillor - Tribune Media Services:
The U.S. Senate, in all its splendor and majesty, has decided that an "enemy combatant" is any non-citizen whom the president says is an enemy combatant, including your Korean greengrocer or your Swedish grandmother or your Czech au pair, and can be arrested and held for as long as authorities wish without any right of appeal to a court of law to examine the matter. If your college kid were to be arrested in Bangkok or Cairo, suspected of "crimes against the state," and held in prison, you'd assume that an American foreign service officer would be able to speak to your kid and arrange for a lawyer, but this may not be true anymore. Be forewarned.

The Senate also decided it's up to the president to decide whether it's OK to make these enemies stand naked in cold rooms for a couple days in blinding light and be beaten by interrogators. This is now purely a bureaucratic matter: The plenipotentiary stamps the file "enemy combatants" and throws the poor schnooks into prison and at his leisure he tries them by any sort of kangaroo court he wishes to assemble and they have no right to see the evidence against them, and there is no appeal. This was passed by 65 senators and will now be signed by Mr. Bush, put into effect, and in due course be thrown out by the courts.

[...]

None of the men and women who voted for this bill has any right to speak in public about the rule of law anymore, or to take a high moral view of the Third Reich, or to wax poetic about the American Idea. Mark their names. Any institution of higher learning that grants honorary degrees to these people forfeits its honor. Alexander, Allard, Allen, Bennett, Bond, Brownback, Bunning, Burns, Burr, Carper, Chambliss, Coburn, Cochran, Coleman, Collins, Cornyn, Craig, Crapo, DeMint, DeWine, Dole, Domenici, Ensign, Enzi, Frist, Graham, Grassley, Gregg, Hagel, Hatch, Hutchison, Inhofe, Isakson, Johnson, Kyl, Landrieu, Lautenberg, Lieberman, Lott, Lugar, Martinez, McCain, McConnell, Menendez, Murkowski, Nelson of Florida, Nelson of Nebraska, Pryor, Roberts, Rockefeller, Salazar, Santorum, Sessions, Shelby, Smith, Specter, Stabenow, Stevens, Sununu, Talent, Thomas, Thune, Vitter, Voinovich, Warner.

To paraphrase Sir Walter Scott: Mark their names and mark them well. For them, no minstrel raptures swell. High though their titles, proud their name, boundless their wealth as wish can claim, these wretched figures shall go down to the vile dust from whence they sprung, unwept, unhonored and unsung.
Read on

Mark Moreford - Dead Iraqis, Just Like Jelly Beans... Bush Tries To Count.

From SFGate.com:
George W. Bush was confused.

It certainly wasn't the first time. He was muttering a sullen response to a reporter's question about some big new study. He was saying no, he really didn't believe that it was possible that the disastrous U.S. invasion of Iraq had resulted in the brutal deaths of more than half a million Iraqi civilians, about 650,000, or 2.5 percent of the entire Iraq population, or one heckuva lot more jelly beans than you could fit into that giant glass jar at the county fair.

Wait, what? Where did that last part come from? Did he just say that out loud? Check the icky media people: No one was looking at him strangely. No reporters were dialing their cell phones in a delirious rush to call their editors with a crazy new Dubya quote. OK. Whew. Must have been in his head. Thank goodness.

Read on...

Habeas Corpus R.I.P.

Buck Batard at Bad Attitudes:
Now that the concept of Habeas Corpus in America is lost to the Ages and Executive Power has been created equal in power and scope to that wielded by one of the most hated men in History, I offer here — rescued from the dustbin of history— a short portion of Emma Goldman’s address to the jury delivered by her at her trial after her arrest for violating the now villified Espionage Act (shortly prior to the equally infamous Palmer Raids).

Unless you sit on a “military tribunal”, you may never have the opportunity to hear these words or ones like them spoken in a courtroom in America again. Essential truths are nevertheless timeless and irrefutable.

More...

Tell me again, what is the duty of the president?

Wasn't there something in there about, oh, you know, Preserving and protecting the Constitution?

Glenn Greenwald at Unclaimed Territory:
When President Bush signed the so-called Military Commissions Act of 2006 into law this week, he dismissed away objections to its Draconian and tyrannical provisions with one very simple and straightforward argument:
Over the past few months the debate over this bill has been heated, and the questions raised can seem complex. Yet, with the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously, and did we do what it takes to defeat that threat? Every member of Congress who voted for this bill has helped our nation rise to the task that history has given us.
That paragraph from the President's remarks is an excellent summary of the philosophy of the Bush movement. Because the threat posed by The Terrorists is so grave and mortal, maximizing protections against it is the paramount, overriding goal. As a result, no other value really competes with that objective in importance, nor can any other objective or value limit our efforts to protect ourselves against The Terrorists. That's what the President is arguing when he said: "Yet, with the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously, and did we do what it takes to defeat that threat." All that matters is whether we did everything possible to protect ourselves.

[...]

But our entire system of government, from its inception, has been based upon the precise opposite calculus -- that many things matter besides merely protecting ourselves against threats which might kill us, and beyond that, we are willing to accept an increased risk of death in order to pursue those other values. That worldview -- that maximizing physical safety to the exclusion of all else leads to a poor and empty way of life, and that limiting government power is so necessary that we do it even if it means accepting an increased risk of death when doing so -- is what lies at the very core of what America is.

The Bill of Rights contains all sorts of limitations on government power which make us more vulnerable to threats that can kill us. If there is a serial killer on the loose in a community, the police would be able to find and apprehend him much more easily if they could simply invade and search everyone's homes at will and without warning. But the Fourth Amendment expressly prohibits the police from doing that -- it requires both probable cause and a judicial warrant before they can do so -- even though that restriction makes it more likely that we will be victimized, even fatally, by criminals.
More...

Stars on Their Collars, Tails Between Their Legs

Jeff Huber at Pen and Sword:
According to the senior American military spokesman in Iraq, the U.S. led crackdown on Baghdad is a bust. But that senior military spokesman is being very Bush administration friendly in the way he couches his terms. Major General William B. Caldwell IV calls the recent surge in violence in Iraq's capital city "disheartening."

That's an interesting choice of words, General. It's "disheartening" when the top college on your wish list turns you down, or you don't get that promotion you thought you were a shoe-in for, or the publishing deal for your first novel falls to pieces in the 11th hour. When the plans of the world's mightiest nation for terminating a war go down the tubes time after time after time after time, it's an unmitigated disaster. And when that mighty nation's senior military officers prevaricate for the sake of protecting their political masters, it's an unforgivable disgrace.

[...]

During a recent televised briefing in Baghdad, Caldwell said it was "no coincidence" that the increasing number of deaths in Iraq “coincide with our increased presence on the streets of Baghdad and the run-up to the American midterm elections.”

It's no coincidence that things coincide? That's a brilliant conclusion, General.

[...]

I can't help but conclude that the increased deaths and frustration prior to the elections weren't expected. I suspect that the much-ballyhooed offensives in Ramadi and Baghdad were calculated to provide major successes in Iraq prior to the midterm elections, and now that they haven't, the likes of Caldwell are helping to reverse the spin in a way that will keep the ball in the GOP's court.
More...

Caligula - The model for US foreign policy?

From Larry Johnson's No Quarter:

We are gathered together to reflect upon our country's adoption of Caligula's motto for effective foreign policy, ODERINT DUM MET UANT, "let them hate us, as long as they fear us." As we do so, let us observe a brief moment of silence for the United States Information Agency and also for our republic, both of which long stood for a different approach.

[...]

Americans began our independence with an act of public diplomacy, an appeal for international support, based upon a "decent regard to the opinion of mankind." But, 243 years later, we convinced ourselves that, inasmuch as we had won decisive victories over totalitarianism and tyranny and democracy and the rule of law faced no serious counter arguments anywhere, our history had been fulfilled, and the requirement to explain ourselves to others had ended.

[...]

No country was then more widely admired or emulated than ours. The superior features of our society – our insistence on individual liberty under law; the equality of opportunity we had finally extended to all; the egalitarianism of our prosperity; our openness to ideas, change, and visito rs; our generous attention to the development of other nations; our sacrifices to defend small states against larger predators both in the Cold War and, most recently, in the war to liberate Kuwait; our championship of international order and the institutions we had created to maintain it after World War II; the vigor of our democracy and our dedication to untrammeled debate – were recognized throughout the world. Critics of our past misadventures, as in Vietnam, had been silenced by the spectacle of our demonstrable success. This, our political betters judged, made the effort to explain ourselves, our purposes, and our policies through public diplomacy an unnecessary anachronism. The spread of global media and the internet, many believed, made official information and cultural programs irrelevant.

[...]

That was, of course, before we suffered the trauma of 9/11 and underwent the equivalent of a national nervous breakdown. It was before we panicked and decided to construct a national-security state that would protect us from the risks posed by foreign visitors or evil-minded Americans armed with toenail clippers or liquid cosmetics. It was before we decided that policy debate is unpatriotic and realized that the only thing foreigners understand is the use of force. It was before we replaced the dispassionate judgments of our intelligence community with the faith-based analyses of our political leaders. It was before we embraced the spin-driven strategies that have stranded our armed forces in Afghani stan, marched them off to die in the terrorist ambush of Iraq, and multiplied and united our Muslim enemies rather than diminishing and dividing them. It was before we began to throw our values overboard in order to stay on course while evading attack. It was before, in a mere five years, we transformed ourselves from 9/11's object of almost universal sympathy and support into the planet's most despised nation, with its most hateful policies.

More...

"Glitches" "hiccups" "snags" and "snafus"

Welcome to election 2006.
Brad Freidman in Huffington Post:
The headline is "Voting Glitches Feared on Nov. 7", but as a close reading of the article goes on to reveal, these are not "voting glitches". They are not even "glitches". They are voting machine company and elections officials FAILURES. Period. End of story. Got that?

The story rightly refers to "a virtual meltdown" from last spring's primary in Chicago and Cook County, and goes on to add that vote totals can be completely fried...
[I]t will still be possible for workers to accidentally fry vote totals if they forget to disconnect the power from ballot scanners before data cartridges are removed at the end of the night.

"We don't want you to erase any of the memory," warned Gail Weisberg, Cook County's equipment manager coordinator, during a training class last week in Hoffman Estates.
So vote totals can be entirely "fried" and yet we're actually using this system on November 7th?! Moreover, note the language above that says it's "possible for workers" to fry the vote totals. Instead of the more appropriate, "it's possible that the poorly designed systems could have their entire vote totals fried."
There is more...

Rolling Stone, Cover Story: Worst Congress Ever.

Matt Taibbi, from the article:

There is very little that sums up the record of the U.S. Congress in the Bush years better than a half-mad boy-addict put in charge of a federal commission on child exploitation. After all, if a hairy-necked, raincoat-clad freak like Rep. Mark Foley can get himself named co-chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, one can only wonder: What the hell else is going on in the corridors of Capitol Hill these days?

These past six years were more than just the most shameful, corrupt and incompetent period in the history of the American legislative branch. These were the years when the U.S. parliament became a historical punch line, a political obscenity on par with the court of Nero or Caligula -- a stable of thieves and perverts who committed crimes rolling out of bed in the morning and did their very best to turn the mighty American empire into a debt-laden, despotic backwater, a Burkina Faso with cable.

Continue

There are three good posts you need to read at No Quarter.

Now, this really makes me feel secure.

So the FBI wants to know my surfing habits... Hmmm. What shall I pack for GITMO.

Stevem D at Booman:
They want your ISP provider to keep records of your internet activities and make them available to the FBI whenever it wishes. FBI Director Mueller said as much yesterday:

FBI Director Robert Mueller on Tuesday called on Internet service providers to record their customers' online activities, a move that anticipates a fierce debate over privacy and law enforcement in Washington next year. "Terrorists coordinate their plans cloaked in the anonymity of the Internet, as do violent sexual predators prowling chat rooms," Mueller said in a speech at the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in Boston. [...]

The trouble with keeping long term records of our internet activity ready and available for FBI inspection is that we know it won't stop at "terrorists" or "child pornographers" or "drug dealers/users" or any other category of bad people we believe we need our government to keep our eye on. Because it is oh so easy to decide that your political opponents or those who publicly protest current government policies are "terrorists" or "terrorist sympathizers" who bear watching by Big Brother:[...]

You can see where this is going, can't you? Police state, anyone? [...]

Under the Patriot Act, the US Government already require Libraries to disclose records pertaining to the books you check out. Will our cable companies and satellite TV providers be next, asked to keep tabs on what TV shows we watch? How about Netflix or Blockbuster? Will they be asked to retain customer records on what movies we rent? Will our local merchants be asked to keep tabs on the groceries we buy, the prescriptions we use, and the home improvement supplies we purchase? Don't bet against it.

And "Terrorism" will be the universal excuse for the further diminution of our few remaining rights and civil liberties. Just as it was the excuse to eliminate the writ of habeas corpus and permit torture on anyone the President or his delegated lackeys deem to be an "enemy combatant" under the recently signed Military Commissions Act.

We are headed for very bad times people. They have been bad enough the last 6 years, but they are about to get much, much worse. Don't believe me? Then try believing your own eyes. What powers haven't Bush administration officials attempted to abrogate solely to themselves whenever the opportunity presented itself? Can't think of any? What a Big Effing Surprise, eh?

Read the entire post (if you dare)

Patrick Cockburn: The General was far too gentle

Patrick Cockburn quoted in Once Upon A Time:
The fact that there is a civil war in Iraq should no longer be in doubt, with the UN saying that 3,000 Iraqi civilians are being killed every month and the dramatic claim last week by American and Iraqi health researchers that the true figure goes as high as 15,000 a month.

[...]


The present slaughter in Iraq is taking place because the existing ethnic and sectarian hostilities have combined with animosities that have been created by the occupation. For instance, a Sunni ex-army officer supporting the resistance now sees a Shia serving in the Iraqi army or police force not just as the member of a different Islamic sect but as a traitor to his country who is actively collaborating with the hated invader.


The last excuse for the occupation was that at least it prevented civil war, but this it very visibly is not doing. On the contrary it de-legitimises the Iraqi government, army and police force, which are seen by Iraqis as pawns of the occupier. When I've asked people in Baghdad what they think of their government, they often reply: "What government? We never see it. It does nothing for us."
More

Kieth Olbermann: The Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”

As posted on Crooks and Liars:

We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has said it is unacceptable to compare anything this country has ever done, to anything the terrorists have ever done.

We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has insisted again that "the United States does not torture. It's against our laws and it's against our values" and who has said it with a straight face while the pictures from Abu Ghraib Prison and the stories of Waterboarding figuratively fade in and out, around him.

We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who may now, if he so decides, declare not merely any non-American citizens "Unlawful Enemy Combatants" and ship them somewhere — anywhere — but may now, if he so decides, declare you an "Unlawful Enemy Combatant" and ship you somewhere - anywhere.

And if you think this, hyperbole or hysteria… ask the newspaper editors when John Adams was President, or the pacifists when Woodrow Wilson was President, or the Japanese at Manzanar when Franklin Roosevelt was President.

And if you somehow think Habeas Corpus has not been suspended for American citizens but only for everybody else, ask yourself this: If you are pulled off the street tomorrow, and they call you an alien or an undocumented immigrant or an "unlawful enemy combatant" — exactly how are you going to convince them to give you a court hearing to prove you are not? Do you think this Attorney General is going to help you?

This President now has his blank check.

He lied to get it.

He lied as he received it.

Is there any reason to even hope, he has not lied about how he intends to use it, nor who he intends to use it against?

[...]

Did it ever occur to you once, that in just 27 months and two days from now when you leave office, some irresponsible future President and a "competent tribunal" of lackeys would be entitled, by the actions of your own hand, to declare the status of "Unlawful Enemy Combatant" for… and convene a Military Commission to try… not John Walker Lindh, but George Walker Bush?
It occurs to me that he might not be planning to leave in 27 months and two days.

Read on

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Where do YOU stand on Iraq?

The Rude Pundit:
Let's say we line up, oh, hell, a couple hundred thousand American soldiers, fine men and women in combat uniform, officers, non-coms, grunts, and we put them on TV. Then George W. Bush walks in with a loaded glock. Now let's say that the President puts the gun to the temple of the first soldier and says, "If I shoot this Army private dead, there's a chance America will be victorious and democracy will bring peace to Iraq. Do you want me to do it?" There's no guarantees, though - just the chance. What would you say?

For the sake of argument here, let's say that you answer, "Yes, it's worth a soldier for the chance for peace in Iraq." So George W. Bush shoots the soldier in the temple and turns to his advisors, who check reports and, no, still no peace.

Then the President says, "If I cut off one limb or the genitals of the next ten soldiers, there's a chance America will be victorious and democracy will bring peace to Iraq. Do you want me to do it?" What would you say?

[...]
Continue

Can we elect them any more stupid?

Booman at Booman Tribune
[...] The War on Terror has now lasted longer than the Civil War, the Korean War, or than our participation in either World War. And, yet, despite this, the people charged with protecting us and winning this war do not know the difference between a Sunni and Shi'ite Muslim.

Not "Representative Terry Everett, a seven-term Alabama Republican who is vice chairman of the House intelligence subcommittee on technical and tactical intelligence." Not "Willie Hulon, chief of the bureau’s new national security branch." Not Gary Bald, (once) the FBI's counterterrorism chief. Not "Representative Jo Ann Davis, a Virginia Republican who heads a House intelligence subcommittee charged with overseeing the C.I.A.’s performance in recruiting Islamic spies and analyzing information." None of these individuals knew how to answer when reporter Jeff Stein asked them to articulate the difference.

[...]

To his credit, he asked me to explain the differences. I told him briefly about the schism that developed after the death of the Prophet Muhammad, and how Iraq and Iran are majority Shiite nations while the rest of the Muslim world is mostly Sunni. “Now that you’ve explained it to me,” he replied, “what occurs to me is that it makes what we’re doing over there extremely difficult, not only in Iraq but that whole area.”

More

The former head of The U.S. Elections Assistance Commission: the United States voting system is "ripe for stealing elections."

Steven D at Booman Tribune
Brad Blog has a copy of a partial transcript of an interview by a "major broadcast network" of the former head of the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission appointed by Bush, Rev. DeForest Soaries. In that unaired interview, the Rev. Soaries says that, in the wake of HAVA (Help America Vote Act), the United States voting system is "ripe for stealing elections."

[Rev. DeForest] Soaries was appointed by George W. Bush as the first chair of the commission created by the federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in the wake of the 2000 Presidential Election Debacle. In the interview, available here for the first time, Soaries excoriates both Congress and the White House, referring to their dedication to reforming American election issues as "a charade" and "a travesty," and says the system now in place is "ripe for stealing elections and for fraud."

Having resigned from the commission in April of 2005, Soaries goes on to explain that he believes he was "deceived" by both the White House and Congress, and that neither were ever "really serious about election reform." [...]

Continue

(I'd like to know which upstanding broadcaster decided this wasn't newsworthy)


An interview with with the professor of computer science at Rice who is researching security of electronic voting machines.

Charles Kuffner at Kuff's World:
I'm talking today with Dan Wallach, professor of computer science at Rice University, who's been doing a lot of research on the effect and security of electronic voting machines. Dan, as you know, there was recently a study done by some Princeton professors about the Diebold voting machines and how one could compromise them and change or affect the votes that are recorded on them. Could you tell me a little more about that and kind of give me a bottom line as to how concerned people who use those machines should be about them?

Dan Wallach: So what the Princeton study did was they were able to get themselves an actual Diebold voting system--basically the same as the ones that are used in Maryland and Georgia and several other states--and what they figured out was that when poll workers are operating Diebold voting systems, there are memory cards that they move around to collect the results at the end of the day. And what they found was that they could actually create a virus that would spread from one machine to the next by virtue of that memory card moving around. This is analogous to the days before the Internet, when viruses could spread on floppies from one computer to another, and they basically figured out they could do that with Diebold voting systems. And the reason why that's significant is that you only need to infect one machine. So you compromise one machine, and then that infection can spread throughout the entire county.

Continue

Olbermann on the day you and I became candidates for GITMO.

SilentPatriot at Crooks and Liars:
Today, 135 years to the day after the last American President (Ulysses S. Grant) suspended habeas corpus, President Bush signed into law the Military Commissions Act of 2006. At its worst, the legislation allows President Bush or Donald Rumsfeld to declare anyone — US citizen or not — an enemy combatant, lock them up and throw away the key without a chance to prove their innocence in a court of law. In other words, every thing the Founding Fathers fought the British empire to free themselves of was reversed and nullified with the stroke of a pen, all under the guise of the War on Terror.

Video-WMP Video-QT

Jonathan Turley joined Keith to talk about the law that Senator Feingold said would be seen as "a stain on our nation's history."

Continue

Read the comments

Democrats! Use VIDEO PHONES to Document GOP Election Fraud

I'm copying and pasting the whole thing from DemocraticUnderground. You should go there and read some of the comments:
We know why Karl Rove is still smiling and why W. has no plan for defeat. It is because they both expect GOP operatives to be out in force obstructing Democratic voters. They expect long lines and malfuctioning machines at Democratic polling places. They expect Diebold machines to change Democratic votes to Republican.

We have the tools to document this election fraud activity! All you need is your Video Cell Phone. Stick around your local Democratic polling place. If the line is too long, record it. If the doors do not open on time, record it. If they run out of ballots, record it. If suspicious people are giving out bad advice record THEIR FACES. If the police set up road blocks, record their license plates.

Anything you capture on video that does not look right can be uploaded on YouTube as well as being sent to the Democrats and the news. See how Republican obstructionists like having their faces on the internet telling people that they will be arrested for voting. See how quickly something gets done about the lack of machines when it is on YouTube and the whole country can see it. Be sure to film the closest GOP polling spot and its short lines and uncrowded facilities for comparison, just to drive the point home if you are going to put up a video.

Now, this is the most important. We have all heard about Diebold machines that switch the votes before people's eyes. If everyone would film the screen when they vote, maybe we could capture some of those moments on video and post them on YouTube. Such footage would be priceless. It would probably end E-voting in this country.
Go to the original post

Monday, October 16, 2006

BREAKING: The US Army (A Demographic Timebomb)

xzynx at The All Spin Zone:
What is really happening inside the US Army and what are the long-term implications?

This line of inquiry begins with the Daily Kos diary, “My Saddest Consumer Experience, Ever”. It’s a diary which relates the following encounter with a career Marine:

“I'm a Marine, and I just got back from Iraq on… what day is it, Friday? Monday, and I've been drinkin' since. Probably be drinkin' until I go back - not to Iraq, but back in. This war is a mistake, it's all based on lies. We never found any weapons over there, men and women are being killed for no reason. It's a mistake and there's no reason for it. I've been there..”

…his face jolted as if he had just realized what he was saying. This man was broken, and there was absolutely no reason for it. His voice cracked as he continued

This is a stark illustration of one of the unintended consequences of the Bush Administration’s Iraq fiasco. Its aftermath will bring fundamental and disturbing changes to US Army demographics.

[...]

no one wants felons and skinheads in the Army and it is a real frustrating situation. Do I believe more middle-upper class to upper-class kids should be in the military, especially since they probably are reaping all the benefits of being an American

I'm concerned about “after Iraq”. I think we've poisoned the well ... a very bad thing. We've fought a two front war without any shared sacrifice, so we will have almost 40 years withoiut any collective notion of providing for the common defense.

What's more, traditionally demographics with high enlistment propensity are lost forever.

A generation of USAR/Guard folks have bad attitudes.

Dark days are ahead post Iraq

This is the first explicit reference to what may become a demographic time bomb in the Army. The Iraq war is fundamentally altering the Army’s demographic character and the trend isn’t good.

This OCS thread started because of a report on the www.defenselink.mil website. Now we find out why the report has been purged.

Well folks, my original cause for alarm about PFC Cindra Smith (the woman featured at the top of this thread) was apparanely justified.

This washed up 40 year old was the subject of an Army propaganda piece on how she enlisted as an EOD tech to avenge the injury of her daughter in Iraq. Numerous right-wing military blogs held her up as a scion of virtue and a sign that 40 year olds Moms are just as desirable E-3s as 20 year old men. There was only one problem: her daughter was never injured in Iraq or even in the military.

Both Smith and PFC Stephen Green were the subjects of Army News propaganda pieces. Both were found to be deviants (of varying degrees of course). If these folks are held up for media scrutiny, what is to be said of those we deliberately try to hide from public view.
Read the entire post