Saturday, September 30, 2006

Larry Johnson at No Quarter: You might be a Republican

These are Larry's questions:


Ask yourself the following questions and decide, “Are you a Republican?”
(and my apologies to Jeff Foxworthy)

If you enjoy shoplifting while working at the White House, you might be a Republican.


[...]

If you enjoy soliciting teenagers and children for sex over the internet, you might be a Republican:

[...]

If you enjoy sending other people’s children to war while your kids go to college and hang out in bars, you might be a Republican

More

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Where are all the patriots?

You know, the ones who were going to 'save' Terri Schiavo, by preventing the unconstitutional denial of her rights.

According to the constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 2

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
But isn't that just what the senate did today. Suspended Habeas Corpus, at the determination (whim) of the pResident?

Christy Hardin Smith at Firedoglake:

A later US Supreme Court case, one that is truly seminal in terms of the understanding of the writ of habeas and its application under United States legal precedents — Ex Parte Milligan — states as follows:

The two remaining questions in this case must be answered in the affirmative. The suspension of the privilege of the [71 U.S. 2, 131] writ of habeas corpus does not suspend the writ itself. The writ issues as a matter of course; and on the return made to it the court decides whether the party applying is denied the right of proceeding any further with it. (emphasis mine)

Here’s a question: how, exactly, does Huckleberry Graham and John McCain and John Warner and the whole of the Bush Administration think that the writ of habeas corpus, a history of legal precedents in civilian and military courts, and the rule of law can just be thrown out the window for these detainees without the Supreme Court and other courts taking a peek at the constitutionality — or lack thereof — of this proposed mess of a law?

Continue

The Cost of Iraq

SusanUnPC at No Quarter goes into the ungodly costs of this fiasco. I intentionally use the word 'ungodly' to remind all those who view this as a 'Holy' undertaking, that the only undertaking occuring is in the morgues and morturaries around the country.

Think what that money could be accomplishing. Think of the astronomical debt we are incurring in the world financial realm. Someday that debt will be due, and it will not fall on Bush, Cheney, Rove or any of the other vermin infesting the White House.

Nope. It will fall on you and me, and all our kids.

From Susan's post:

Nearly $2 billion a week paid by U.S. taxpayers

Half a trillion dollars since 2001 for Iraq and Afghanistan

2,709 American troops killed

[...]

The "heralded" Iraq police academy -- costing $75 million -- is a "disaster"; feces and urine "rained from the ceilings in student barracks"

Al Qaeda gains recruits from Iraq war - U.N. study

Saudi Arabia building a $500-million, 540-mile fence across Iraqi border (part of $12 billion security package)

The Lincoln Group has been awarded a two-year $12.4 million contract to monitor news organizations' coverage of the war in Iraq, including CNN, correspondent Barbara Starr told Lou Dobbs

Republicans repeatedly "vote no" to increase veterans funding; HUD denies contract to firm "critical of President Bush"

Continue

The Moderate Voice: Aren't Death Threats Just Hilarious.

Is it going to take a major catastrophe for some folks to see how bitter, venal partisanship which continues to go into areas far behind debate over issues into personal hatred is taking this country down a path Democrats and Republicans would not have dreamed it could ever realistically reach? The Post item that's quoted would have been axed from any publication I had worked for or contributed to in a second. And they say BLOGS need editors??

Read the post (Links to lots of commentaries)

So this is what it feels like to live in a Banana Republic.

We now officially have a Strongman El-Presidente. Congress just granted those powers today.

There shall be no torture, says congress. But it is 'the decider' who determines if it is torture or not. It is 'the decider' who determines if you are aiding terrorists in your conduct, and if you can be locked away , with no right to confront your accuser, or even to know of what you are accused. You, a citizen of the US, may be determined, without legal representation and defense, to be guilty of capitol crimes and executed. And at that, your loved ones might never find out what happened to you.

Quite literally, your existance is now at the mercy of one man. George W. Bush.

Folks, We. Are. Owned.

I'm sooo glad the grownups are in charge.

Billmon at The Whiskey Bar:
For eight years, Clinton and Gore have extended our military commitments while depleting our military power. Rarely has so much been demanded of our armed forces, and so little given to them in return. George W. Bush and I are going to change that, too. I have seen our military at its finest, with the best equipment, the best training, and the best leadership. I'm proud of them. I have had the responsibility for their well-being. And I can promise them now, help is on the way.

Dick Cheney
Acceptance speech to the GOP national convention
August 2, 2000

_____________________


Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker told congressional staffers last week he is worried that the Army cannot repair vital equipment fast enough because supplemental budget requests have been too little, too late . . . The service has a backlog of thousands of pieces of equipment awaiting repair because there is not enough money to pay for the repairs more quickly, Schoomaker said. None of the Army's five major depots, where damaged and worn out equipment is refurbished, is operating above 50 percent capacity, he said.

Government Executive magazine
Funding shortfalls jeopardize Army operations, chief says
July 17, 2006

[...]

_____________________


If you hate America, despise the Pentagon and want to see the U.S. war machine humbled in Iraq and Afghanistan, then you have to love what the Cheney Administration and its most obedient servants in Congress are doing to the Army.

So what the hell was Chavez complaining about? These guys may be the most effective anti-imperialists on the planet.


Continue

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

The "Help America Destroy 700 Years Of Law" Bill

Digby at Hulaballoo:

By now probably everyone knows that the torture bill that's working its way through the Senate is even worse than the one they crafted last Friday. It's so bad that they are now saying it has "drafting errors" when something particularly egregious is pointed out. One wonders how many other "drafting errors" will wind up in this sloppy, hurried mess. They are rushing it through without anybody knowing what they hell it really says:


I don't know why the Senators are even pretending to know what's in this bill. One of the most important pieces of legislation in recent American history is being put together in the dead of night and hurried through the congress for political reasons. It's a constitutional clusterfuck.

Here's the Washington Post's take on the legislation.


AFTER BARELY three weeks of debate, the Senate today will take up a momentous piece of legislation that would set new legal rules for the detention, interrogation and trial of accused terrorists. We have argued that the only remedy to the mess made by the Bush administration in holding hundreds of detainees without charge at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere since 2001 was congressional action. Yet rather than carefully weigh the issues, Congress has allowed itself to be stampeded into a vote on hastily written but far-reaching legal provisions, in a preelection climate in which dissenters risk being labeled as soft on terrorism.

As we have said before, there is no need for Congress to act immediately. No terrorist suspects are being held in the CIA detention "program" that President Bush has so vigorously defended. Justice for the al-Qaeda suspects he has delivered to Guantanamo has already been delayed for years by the administration's actions and can wait a few more months. What's important is that any legal system approved by Congress pass the tests set by Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) months ago: that the United States can be proud of it, that the world will see it as fair and humane, and that the Supreme Court can uphold it.

[...]

White House pressure may have persuaded many in Congress that the easiest course is to quickly approve the detention bill in its present form and leave town. If so, their actions almost surely will come back to haunt them. Until this country adopts a legal system for the war on terrorism that meets Mr. Warner's standard, the war itself will be unwinnable.
(emphasis mine)
Read the entire post

Digby at Hulaballoo: Sick

It really takes a lot of gall for the NY Post to obnoxiously ridicule Keith Olberman for calling the police when some asshole sent some white powder to his house with a note that said it was in response to his commentary against the president. The NY Post was one of the places that the original anthrax killer hit in 2001 --- and their own employees got sick.

What in the hell is wrong with these people? Jesus.

Larry Johnson at No Quarter: Condi Rice: Liar, Stupid, or Both?

I vote tool.

When it comes to the 9-11 blame game, Condi Rice is either a liar or stupid. No other logical possible explanation accounts for her delusional claim to the New York Post that, "We were not left a comprehensive strategy to fight al Qaeda." Rice was responding to President Clinton, who told Chris Wallace last week that his Adminstration left the Bush Administration with a plan for dealing with the Al Qaeda threat.

But this ain't a case of "He said, She said". There is a documentary record and it is unambiguous. In fact there are two documents. First, is the strategy itself. Comprehensive and straightforward. Second, is the memo from Clarke to Rice. For folks unaccustomed to the intricacies of bureaucracy, this memo, which was given to Rice on 25 Janaury 2001, is the equivalent of a smoking mushroom cloud. This is truly damning because it provides the road map for the actions the Bush team should have taken but didn't.

Continue

Keith Olbermann strikes again! Take a look at Number 43, before 9-11.

Again, there is a transcript. But again, you really need to hear Kieth's delivery of this trip to the woodshed for Bush, Cheney, Rice et.al.

Crooks and Liars:

Comma













(Tip of the hat to Mia Culpa)

Kieth Olberman Is the 21st century Edward R. Murrow

This is at Crooks and Liars:

The Transcript is here. But you really should listen to what all the press should sound like, then copy the transcript, and go back and read it from time to time.

Video - WMV Video - QT

Where is Peak Oil, and how long am I going to be able to continue to afford gasoline?

TomDispatch:

The price of crude oil, which this summer threatened to top $80 a barrel, briefly dipped under $60 for the first time in six months yesterday, a 23% decline from July highs. In the Midwest, where gas not long ago had soared to $3 at the pump, it now averages, according to the Energy Department, a nationwide low of $2.20 a gallon ($1.89 at one Jackson, Missouri gas station).

At the same time, another set of figures rose precipitously. According to a recent Gallup Poll, 42% of Americans "agreed with the statement that the Bush administration ‘deliberately manipulated the price of gasoline so that it would decrease before this fall's elections.'" Two-thirds of those respondents were registered Democrats for whose party the price at the pump has proved a potent issue.

Such a conspiratorial train of thought is not exactly lacking in logic. After all, the President and Vice President arrived in office deeply tied to the energy business (which has been a major supporter of the Republican Party) and promptly Halliburtonized the military, then Iraq, [...]

[...]for those of us living now, the "peak" is more likely to feel like a plateau -- lasting for perhaps a decade or more -- in which global oil production will experience occasional ups and downs without rising substantially (as predicted by those who dismiss peak-oil theory), nor falling precipitously (as predicted by its most ardent proponents).

During this interim period, particular events -- a hurricane, an outbreak of conflict in an oil region -- will temporarily tighten supplies, raising gasoline prices, while the opening of a new field or pipeline, or simply (as now) the alleviation of immediate fears and a temporary boost in supplies will lower prices. Eventually, of course, we will reach the plateau's end and the decline predicted by the theory will commence in earnest.

In the meantime, for better or worse, we live on that plateau today. If this year's hurricane season ends with no major storms, and we get through the next few months without a major blowup in the Middle East, we are likely to start 2007 with lower gasoline prices than we've seen in a while. This is not, however, evidence of a major trend. Because global oil supplies are never likely to be truly abundant again, it would only take one major storm or one major crisis in the Middle East to push crude prices back up near or over $80 a barrel. This is the world we now inhabit, and it will never get truly better until we develop an entirely new energy system based on petroleum alternatives and renewable fuels.

more

Lying for Christ. The right defiles the nation's religious faith.

From Melissa Rogers Blog:

Americans United provides a more detailed report on the Family Research Council's workshop entitled "Getting Church Voters to the Polls." Here's an excerpt from AU's story:

The plan calls on church members to use their church directories to find voters who favor a certain candidate. Those voters are then targeted for follow-up calls. On election day, only persons identified as supporting the “favored” candidate will be reminded to vote.

[Connie] Marshner instructed the audience to give the directory to someone who does not attend the church and instruct them to call each person listed in it posing as a non-partisan pollster. According to a script in the manual, the caller should say, “Hello, I’m with ABC Polls. We’re calling in your area to find out the level of interest in the upcoming [U.S. Senate/House of Representatives/state assembly/town council/school board/etc.] election.”

“It’s very important that the person doing the calling is not known to the person being called,” Marshner told attendees. “Get someone from outside the church.”

[...]

When a few other members of the audience challenged the ethics of the plan, Marshner said it was time to move on.

Reporters need to follow up on this story. Then those stories need to be disseminated to every person in an American pew.

Some of the people who complain the loudest about threats to religion from the outside seem to be busy damaging faith from the inside.

More

A rather long post by Commander Jeff Huber "Clausewitz, Sun Tzu and Generalissimo George"

No one starts a war--or rather, no one in his senses ought to do so--without first being clear in his mind what he intends to achieve by that war and how he intends to conduct it.

-- Carl von Clausewitz.
What a profound pity it is that the mightiest nation in the world has proven the wisdom of the masters of the art of war by ignoring them.

Five years into our Global War on Terror--or whatever we're calling it today--the latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) tells us that our experiment in Iraq has energized Islamic fundamentalism and made the global terrorism situation worse, and that the Bush administration needs to come up with a new strategy. Five years is a heck of a long time to figure out that your strategy isn't working.

We’re not even sure what we want to achieve, much less how to achieve it.
He who wishes to fight must first count the cost. When you engage in actual fighting, if victory is long in coming, then men's weapons will grow dull and their ardor will be dampened

--Sun Tzu
[...]

When you start out your reign by calling your adversaries an "axis of evil," as young Mister Bush did, you can't be surprised when your adversaries give you back what you gave them. It shouldn't have shocked anyone when President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela called Mister Bush "the devil" at last week's UN summit.

There's little question that much of Mister Bush's rhetoric and his militaristic adventures are part of a manhood-measurment contest. That sort of thing is laughable when practiced by schoolboys, but it's to be condemned when engaged in by the head of state of the world's mightiest nation.

There's a good chance that the Bush demonizing by Chavez, Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other world leaders will goad Mister Bush into launching yet another asinine war, this time with Iran. If that happens, there's an even better chance that's what Chavez, Ahmadinejad, and the rest of them had in mind--double-dog-daring the adolescent Emperor into doing something incredibly stupid (again), something that will do another Humpty Dumpty number on his empire.
More

Don't you just hate it when facts bite you in the ass?

Steven D at Booman Tribune:
Oh, those pesky reality-based facts. Despite the Republicans' best efforts to hide the damage Bush's war policies have done our military, sometimes the truth still manages to sneak its head above the the rising tide of GOP lies, like the one about how well they support the troops. Especially when The Army's top General decides to tell it:

WASHINGTON // The Army's top officer withheld a required 2008 budget plan from Pentagon leaders in August after protesting to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld that the service could not maintain its current level of activity in Iraq plus its other global commitments without billions in additional funding.

The decision by Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, the Army's chief of staff, is believed to be unprecedented and signals a widespread belief within the Army that in the absence of significant troop withdrawals from Iraq, funding assumptions must be completely reworked, said current and former Pentagon officials. [...]

I guess General Schoomaker didn't get the memo. The one which made it clear that as far as his Commander-in-Chief is concerned his troops are just the tail end of a comma in history. And we all know how worthless commas are. Why waste good money helping them stay alive in Iraq, when those funds could be put to better use by Paris Hilton and friends?

More

Larry Johnson on the facts behind the NIE.

Although the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) regarding Iraq and terrorism is still classified (UPDATE: The Key Judgments are now declassified and can be found at this link), the data behind the findings is not and has been publicly available for three years. I have written repeatedly on this fact and it has been, I am told, the judgment of the intelligence community for at least two years. The statistics on terrorist activity, until this year, were published in the State Department's annual report on terrorism (Patterns of Global Terrorism). The Bush Administration tried to not publish the report last year because the data showed an unprecedented surge in international terrorist attacks. The following chart shows the bad news (it is based on the statistics collected by the CIA and supplied to the Department of State):

Comparison_of_significant_attacks_2






A








"Significant" terrorist incident is one in which a person was killed, wounded or kidnapped (or there was property damage in excess of $10,000). The statistics tell a very clear and simple story (I bet someone who can read My Pet Goat can figure it out).
I'm not sure I'd take that bet.

Continue

I love the title of the post. "Still Smoking Crack About Iraq"

Commander Jeff Huber at Pen and Sword:
"If we withdraw before the job is done, the enemy will follow us here.''

-- Attributed to General John Abizaid of U.S. Central Command, which encompasses the theaters of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan

How will they get here, General? That's a long way to swim.

[...]

"They" don't have an air force or a navy that can bring them here. Nobody else does either. There is, in fact, no state or non-state entity that can bring significant conventional military force to bear on the continental United States.

Moreover, if "they" did have an air force and a navy and tried to use it to invade us, they'd be doing us a favor. Our Navy and Air Force could sink them and shoot them down before they got halfway across the ocean.

And if we take this ludicrous scenario just a bit further, it would actually make sense to "withdraw" and sucker them into trying to invade us. We could mop them up in the course of fine Navy day.

There is, of course, a problem with this operational scheme. If we withdrew, they would probably be smart enough not to squander their navy and air force in a doomed effort to invade and occupy a country halfway across the world.

Which would make them a darn sight smarter than Abizaid or anybody else in charge of this woebegone war on terror.


More

We don't need freedom of the press. We need a press.

The press is once again looking at the pretty shiny things. Oh, there's no one behind that curtain. Let's move along, nothing to see here.

Eric Boehlert, Media Matters:

What's so startling is that we've seen this exact media retreat before -- during the fall of the 2004 campaign. Back then, when sustained, aggressive coverage of the unfolding chaos inside Iraq could have done real damage to the Bush/Cheney ticket, the press shifted its attention away from Baghdad. Instead of a summer of tenacious war coverage, Bush was blessed with a cable news agenda that focused on endless hurricane updates, Martha Stewart's legal woes, and the tawdry Laci Peterson trial. As pollster Peter Hart suggested at the time, any day between August 15, 2004, and October 15, 2004, that Iraq was not making headlines was a good day for the Bush campaign. Suffice it to say, Bush had a lot of good days that autumn.

It was not until after the election that the press -- and particularly television news -- once again showed deep interest in Iraq. Fact: In the 10 weeks prior to Election Day in 2004, the war in Iraq was the most reported story on the weekly night news programs just twice, according to the media research of Andrew Tyndall. But immediately following Bush's re-election, the war in Iraq instantly became the most covered story on the nightly news programs -- for seven weeks in a row.

[...]

There is clear evidence the MSM's pullback from Iraq is paying dividends for the White House, which badly wants the attention away from the war. (Iraq, after all, is "just a comma," according to Bush's weekend spin.) After months of steady erosion, and despite the wave of security breakdowns inside Iraq, the latest USA Today/Gallup poll contained a relatively dramatic turn in public opinion, showing a five percent decline in the percentage of people who think the war in Iraq was a mistake. (The number stands at 49 percent in September, compared to 54 in July and 57 percent in March.)


more

Your pretzeldent wants to protect you... Sure.

Yahoo News:
The Bush administration has blocked release of a report that suggests global warming is contributing to the frequency and strength of hurricanes, the journal Nature reported Tuesday.

The possibility that warming conditions may cause storms to become stronger has generated debate among climate and weather experts, particularly in the wake of the Hurricane Katrina disaster.

[...]

The report drew a prompt response from Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, D-N.J., who charged that "the administration has effectively declared war on science and truth to advance its anti-environment agenda ... the Bush administration continues to censor scientists who have documented the current impacts of global warming."

A series of studies over the past year or so have shown an increase in the power of hurricanes in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, a strengthening that many storm experts say is tied to rising sea-surface temperatures.

More here

Monday, September 25, 2006

Again, why torture is wrong.

Larry Johnson at No Quarter:
...Retired Marine Maj. Gen. Fred E. Haynes, 83, is a veteran of World War II and the Korean and Vietnam wars. In 1945, he was a captain in the regiment that seized Mt. Suribachi on Iwo Jima and raised the U.S. flag there. In March of that year, his unit found two U.S. soldiers dead, apparently victims of torture. On March 17, about 10 days before the battle ended, a Japanese soldier, wearing nothing but his boots and a cotton jock strap, stepped out of a cave with his hands up. He had read one of the leaflets Americans were distributing in artillery shells that promised that anyone who gave up would get his wounds treated and his stomach filled.

The soldier surrendered to a lieutenant who spoke no Japanese. The lieutenant called his company commander to ask what to do with the prisoner.

"As he was talking," Haynes recalled hearing from soldiers in his unit, "a Japanese sniper apparently got a good aim on him and the bullet penetrated his helmet at an angle, scooted around inside the helmet and dropped out the back." Miraculously, the lieutenant was uninjured.

"In good conscience, he could have shot the Japanese [prisoner] dead," said the general, because the soldier could reasonably have concluded that he had been set up. "But he didn't."

Instead, the lieutenant waited for the company commander to join them. He subsequently discovered that French was a language he shared with the prisoner. Speaking French, the Japanese man offered to help clear out caves nearby.

When the prisoner was interrogated by two Marine interpreters fluent in Japanese, they quickly determined that he was the chief code clerk for the Japanese commander on Iwo Jima, an extraordinarily valuable catch.

"He not only knew the situation on Iwo, but he had good insight into the situation on Okinawa, which we were to invade on April 1 and did. He even knew a fair amount about the [Japanese army's] situation with respect to China," Haynes recalled.

The prisoner was immediately sent to the headquarters of Adm. Chester W. Nimitz, and from there to Washington.

"The moral of the story," said the general, "is we Americans have been so thoroughly imbued with the idea that you have to treat prisoners humanely — and this [story] is an example of why. It is an illustration of how by treating an individual decently you are much more likely to get any information you might want — and it's more likely to be correct."
Read the rest

Want to bet your country? Diebold will take that action!

Randall Stross in The New York Times:

Edward W. Felten, a professor of computer science at Princeton, and his student collaborators conducted a demonstration with an AccuVote TS and noticed that the key to the machine’s memory card slot appeared to be similar to one that a staff member had at home.

When he brought the key into the office and tried it, the door protecting the AccuVote’s memory card slot swung open obligingly. Upon examination, the key turned out to be a standard industrial part used in simple locks for office furniture, computer cases, jukeboxes — and hotel minibars.

Once the memory card slot was accessible, how difficult would it be to introduce malicious software that could manipulate vote tallies? That is one of the questions that Professor Felten and two of his students, Ariel J. Feldman and J. Alex Haldeman, have been investigating. In the face of Diebold’s refusal to let scientists test the AccuVote, the Princeton team got its hands on a machine only with the help of a third party.

[...]

The researchers demonstrated the machine’s vulnerability to an attack by means of code that can be introduced with a memory card. The program they devised does not tamper with the voting process. The machine records each vote as it should, and makes a backup copy, too.

Every 15 seconds or so, however, the rogue program checks the internal vote tallies, then adds and subtracts votes, as needed, to reach programmed targets; it also makes identical changes in the backup file. The alterations cannot be detected later because the total number of votes perfectly matches the total number of voters. At the end of the election day, the rogue program erases itself, leaving no trace.

[...]Diebold issued a press release that shrugged off the demonstration and analysis. It said Princeton’s AccuVote machine was “two generations old” and “not used anywhere in the country.”

[...]

Mark G. Radke, director for marketing at Diebold, said that the AccuVote machines were certified by state election officials and that no academic researcher would be permitted to test an AccuVote supplied by the company. “This is analogous to launching a nuclear missile,” he said enigmatically, adding that Diebold had to restrict “access to the buttons.”

WTF?

Read it all

Just what is support for our troops?

Apparently, not much.
AmericaBlog:
President Bush keeps telling us the Iraq is the key to the War on Terror. I happen to disagree -- I believe that the invasion of Iraq was, in fact, a dangerous and inflammatory distraction from the proper way to handle violent extremism -- but President Bush keeps telling me I'm wrong, like when he said this in a radio address he made just a few weeks ago:
The security of the civilized world depends on victory in the war on terror, and that depends on victory in Iraq
The security of the civilized world! I'd say that's pretty important, so the President must be giving our military every possible resource to accomplish its goal, right? Even if it involves calling for sacrifice, perhaps suspending tax breaks for the wealthiest 1% of America, or encouraging big business to pitch in to the war effort, or simply publicly asking Americans to join the military? Since I don't see any of that happening, I guess our troops have must everything they need. Wait . . . they don't? They don't??


Read it all

Benjamin Franklin: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

This is the story of your government in action to protect the president from reality, er... protect the citizens from the truth, er... fight terrristss!

As you read, you will appreciate old Ben more and more.

From the Hartford Courant, by June Sandra Neal:

On Feb. 15, 2005, someone walked into a Connecticut library, sat down at a computer and used the Internet from 4 to 4:45 p.m.

Five months later, two FBI agents walked into George Christian's Windsor office and handed him a letter. It demanded "any and all subscriber information, billing information and access logs of any person or entity related to" the library computer's IP address on that February day.



"It was addressed to the wrong person; it was dated May 19, 2005, and it referred to an event that had taken place six months ago."

The document they handed Christian was a national security letter, a piece of the Patriot Act few people had heard of at the time.

[...]

The librarians never argued the government's need to conduct clandestine surveillance in the pursuit of homeland security. Their concern was solely the absence of a court order, given that the government could easily obtain one from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, created to handle these issues. Further, they wanted the gag order lifted, not to disclose the contents of the letter, but to be able to testify before Congress, which was debating re-authorization of the Patriot Act. They wanted to say that national security letters were indeed being used on libraries - something the government had denied.

The board members did their homework and discovered that, a year earlier, the American Civil Liberties Union had sued on behalf of a private New York Internet company that received a national security letter. The judge ruled that the letter violated the company's constitutional rights. However, that ruling had been stayed and could not help them now.

[...]

Because the terrorists tried to scare us all, we should refuse to be scared. The best way to honor those who died on 9/11 is to support our freedoms. If we are quiet, we take away the very thing we are fighting for. "

Chase: "The NSL is catastrophic for the nation. For government to be viable, it cannot abuse its powers. It's just as important as the privacy of the voting booth."

[...]"This administration has repeatedly shown that it will hide behind the cloak of national security to silence its critics and cover up embarrassing facts. Every time the government invokes national security in defense of secrecy - as they've done most recently with NSA [National Security Agency] wiretapping - the American public should remember these four librarians."

Read the entire article.

Wag the Dog? What the 'Stay the Course" republicans were screaming at Clinton, then. You know, the ones who say we MUST stay in Iraq now.

Some well reasoned Comments from Free Republic:
Names (of presidents) changed to protect the guilty.

If you can stomach this entire comment section you are a better man than I.

This is the beast known as torture. Stare deeply into it's eyes. You can see its bedamned soul.

Ariel Dorfman - The Washington Post:
It is a story that our species has listened to with mounting revulsion, a horror that has led almost every nation to sign treaties over the past decades declaring these abominations as crimes against humanity, transgressions interdicted all across the earth. That is the wisdom, national and international, that has taken us thousands of years of tribulation and shame to achieve. That is the wisdom we are being asked to throw away when we formulate the question -- Does torture work? -- when we allow ourselves to ask whether we can afford to outlaw torture if we want to defeat terrorism.

[...]

Can't the United States see that when we allow someone to be tortured by our agents, it is not only the victim and the perpetrator who are corrupted, not only the "intelligence" that is contaminated, but also everyone who looked away and said they did not know, everyone who consented tacitly to that outrage so they could sleep a little safer at night, all the citizens who did not march in the streets by the millions to demand the resignation of whoever suggested, even whispered, that torture is inevitable in our day and age, that we must embrace its darkness?


Read all

George Bush thinks the current horror in Iraq will be a 'Comma'. Perhaps he will be the 'Comma' who martyred Saddam.

I'm sure 3,000 american families who have lost loved ones, and the 100,000 plus families who have had their loved ones returned from George's 'excellent adventure' shattered in body and mind, think all of this is 'Just a Comma'. Not to mention uncounted thousands in Iraq, who just want to go about their daily routine without fearing death.

I wonder that Shrub's legacy will be as he expects. Personally, I expect Benedict Arnold to finally catch a break.

Shaun D. Mullen at Kiko's House expresses this quite well:

Were Iraqis better off under Saddam Hussein?

That would have been a extraordinary question to ask in 2003. Saddam was, after all, a saber-rattling tyrant. He operated a feared secret police, a system of prisons and psychiatric hospitals full of people who were tortured and held without charge or trial, as well as rape camps.

But three and a half years later, my question has taken on a shocking legitimacy because of the extraordinary mess that the Bush administration has made of everything it has done in Iraq.

[...]

George Bush and his neocon cabal have taken a broken country and broken it all over again. They have succeeded in doing the impossible by making many Iraqis nostalgic for the bad old days.

Will the U.S. guarantee that Saddam Hussein's legacy is martyrdom instead of infamy?

I regret to say that I believe that it will.
Read the post

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Bush and McCaine - The USA Mengele Act. (Not my title - I wish I had thought of it)

Tristero at Hullabaloo:
And let's not kid ourselves that this will stop with terrorist suspects. After all, Tom DeLay used the Department of Homeland Security to try to round-up Democrats to pass his gerrymandering efforts. Of course, I'm not saying that Bush intends to torture to death his American political opponents. But it opens up the possibility down the line of using torture to produce legal evidence for American courts in, say, drug cases, and sex crimes. And when that happens, then yes, it will be pretty easy to re-evaluate the defintion of "terrorist." Let's say a modern-day Elllsberg - we should be so lucky - leaks a new set of Pentagon Papers. With this law, there's no reason to have Plumbers to burglarize his psychiatrist's office - you just grab the doctor and let him find out what a real headshrinking feels like.

I don't think in his wildest dreams Osama bin Laden could have anticipated such a tremendous and rapid victory over America and its values as Bushn delivered. Yes, the destruction of Iraq and any day now, the fall of Iran and the consequent radicalization of millions of Muslims, the ruination of American prestige and influence, not to mention the vampirical drain on our economy: all that bin Laden joyfully anticipated. But for America to abandon all pretense of adherence to western law and morality, that was a pure gift from God to his obedient servant, Osama.
Read all

If you haven't seen the video of WJC dismanteling Chris (he's no Mike) Wallace, you really should.

Tristero at Hullabaloo:
I read the transcript but nothing prepared me for the passion and intelligence shown by President Clinton as he makes mincemeat of Chris Wallace. It really must be seen.

[...]

Within the space of a few minutes, Wallace realized he was in way over his head - that Clinton, this figure he's held in contempt, knew far more about the subject of his responsibilities, his successes, and his failures than Wallace ever would - and that the trap Wallace had tried to spring on Clinton had totally backfired. He seemed to be all but begging Clinton to let him off the hook. But Clinton, both furious and capable of channeling that fury, toyed with him longer. By the end of the segment, Wallace looked drained, grinning inanely, and Clinton appeared as if he was just getting started.

More

Bush intends to bomb Iran. Pray that balanced minds stop him. Or read this and weep.

Jeff Huber at Pen and Sword:
I have no inside knowledge of what the contingency plan for the great big air strike against Iran looks like, but I have a fair idea of how these things work, and I'm pretty certain that any operation against Iran will be mighty big and hard as a diamond cutter to execute properly.

[...]

That's got to involve a lot of targets, and in any major air operation is the total target set has to go well beyond the primary objectives. If you want to bomb a lot of stuff, you have to bomb a lot of other stuff so you can a) get at the stuff you really want to bomb and b) live to bomb another day.

[...] I have read that the master attack plan contains 1,500 targets. I don't know how accurate that number is, but would not be surprised if the size of the actual target set is quite a bit larger.

The bottom line is that in order to give a penny's worth of damage to Iran's nuclear industry we'll have to put a ton's worth of hurt on them.

The prize in the next world order is control of global energy. That's what the Iraq invasion was really about. If there were a single enlightened, influential voice in or around the administration, it would tell young Mister Bush to reverse course immediately, and take steps to supplant China and Russia as Iran's energy partner (which is what Bush should have been doing all along).

Unfortunately for America, the influential policy shapers are the likes of Cheney, John Bolton, Bill Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, and the only thing they have in common with great Asian strategists like Sun Tzu is a fear of losing face. My fear is that if they manage to manipulate America into another act of military lunacy, our country will have squandered its gains of the last century before this one is a decade old. The neoconservatives seem hell bent for Naugahyde to ensure that the United States goes out not with a whimper, but with a very big, very loud bang.

My advice to young Americans who want to succeed in the next world order?

Learn Mandarin and Farsi.

Read the entire article.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Yesterday both Arianna and KOS said "It's not the economy". It IS the economy!

Bonddad in My Left Wing:
First, Iraq/terrorism were always number 1 with "what issue concerns you most" or similar questions. However, the economy was always the second most important issue to people in the latest three polls. And the economy was the most important issue in an ABC news poll from September 5-7.

So - the economy is not the most important issue, but certainly not the least important issue either. Why is that? Well - how about we ask Democratic Party Chair Howard Dean who wrote an editorial yesterday in the Wall Street Journal?


Under Mr. Bush and the Republican Congress, incomes today are $1,000 less for the typical household than during Bill Clinton's final year in office; incomes for the typical working-age household have declined every year since the president took office. Black and Hispanic households have fared worse over the same period: Black household income has fallen every year, after rising every year (except for a one-year $60 dip) under Mr. Clinton. Incomes for Hispanic households are down $1,000, after rising more than $7,000 under Mr. Clinton.

Incomes have fallen because wages -- which provide 75% of income for typical families -- are stagnant for most workers. Under Mr. Bush, wages for college-educated workers increased only 1.3% between 2000 and 2005, as compared to 11.3% during Mr. Clinton's last five years. For the nation's lowest-paid workers, the situation is even worse, as the minimum wage is worth less now than at any time in at least 50 years.

Continued

Bush can't afford to win the 'woah on terra'. It's the only thing he's got going for himself.

From the Existentialist Cowboy:
There is, in fact, no evidence whatsoever that Bush ever killed, captured, or brought to justice even one bona fide terrorist in Iraq and —most certainly —none of those killed by the US in Iraq had anything whatsoever to do with the events of 911. Even George W. Bush recent admitted that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 911 but not before he allowed a terminally gullible American public and a sycophantic corporate media to indulge the delusion and spread the lie for years.

In normal times, that would have gotten a President impeached. These are not normal times. These are times that demonstrate a second very important reason Bush has lost the war on terrorism. These are Orwellian times and terrorism is a perpetual war. Bush has lost this war because he dare not win it and cannot afford to win it. It's the only issue he polls well on; without it, he's finished. It is tragically ironic that the future of humankind may very well depend upon the infamously short American attention span inuring a jaded public to a demagogue who is rapidly approaching the limit to which he can ratchet up a rhetoric that millions have already tuned out.

[...]

Bush dare not win his war on terrorism because it just might turn out to be as fraudulent as everything else about his failed and miserable administration.

Read the post


The Saturday Cartoons - Bob Geiger

Snark, Snark!

This latest batch of Bulls**t has me so depressed...

I will get indignant again soon, I promise. Right now I'm just mourning my country, and what it has already become.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

A Leash That Slowly Tightens. An Immorality tale.

Maccabee at Daily KOS :
I had one of the most frightening conversations during a ride to the airport this morning with a Cabbie that lived under a horrible tyrant. He gave me his predictions for the United States.

[...]

"I went home to Bucharest about a year ago and saw some family. Right now they have more freedoms in Bucharest than you have here. That's the irony. I have children and grandchildren here in America and I see little future for them here. America manufactures nothing. So there will be no real economy in the future. The only thing made in America are deals."

[...]

"You still haven't made your prediction," I reminded him.

"It may take about ten years. But it will be very much like the old Soviet Union. Incompetent government. Walls will appear around you. On the borders. Your internet sites will be scrubbed or monitored or may suddenly disappear. A government will control everything from one branch, businesses too will be in bed with the government. One day you will see your boss have the power to go through your bags. One day your corporation will have more rights than you have. Just like in Romania, we had conspiracy theories. One nuttier than the next. It turned out to be mostly true these things. This thing that has happened to America was planned for a long time. And like Romania, people will forget and lose all the principles that your country was founded on. We had a Constitution in Romania. Under the communists?....just words."

As unsettling as it is please read the whole thing. (and some of the comments too.)

Iraq, Bush's own Hell on Earth.

After all, 'Old Nick' is the 'Father of Lies', why shouldn't the lyingest administration in history be able to create their own hellish reality?

The Existential Cowboy:

Bush makes a hell of Iraq; Chavez smells sulfur; the minions of Satan get rich!

Iraq is hell if you live there, survive there, get tortured there. If it gets worse —and it will — the dead will be called lucky. War may be hell but Iraq is the product of one man's lies, frauds, deceptions. Things are so bad that I wonder if Bush will withdraw, re-invade and hope things turn out better. But that assumes Bush wants things to turn out better. He doesn't.

Truth is things couldn't be worse but, as long as Bush occupies Iraq and the White House, things will get worse anyway. Truth is the Iraqi people were better off under Saddam than Bush and are probably nostalgic for Saddam. Truth is we won't get the truth —not on the American media, anyway. It was left to the BBC to report its lead story: torture in Iraq is more hellish now than under former leader Saddam Hussein, demonized and all but compared to Satan by Bush.

Bush had cited Saddam's own hellish torture program as one of his many rationales for the US war of aggression —itself a hell on earth called "Shock and Awe" —the source of pictures of modern, mechanized, souless hell fire if not brimstone. After the attack and invasion, Bush boasted about how much better things were for the Iraqi on the street. That was just one of innumerable lies that this "deceiver of nations" has perpetrated upon the American people and the entire world. Had the Iraqi people been delivered? Into hell! None of this was told us. We were deliberately deceived. All the nations of the world were deceived.

"Iraq is free of rape rooms and torture chambers.

—"President" Bush, 2003 Republican National Committee Presidential Gala, Oct. 8, 2003

Uh huh! That was a lie that was told to all the nations of the world. There's more.
Continue

This is just so depressing...

McCain has now covered Bush's butt. Wonder what he got in return.

Hullabaloo: Punked

and

No Quarter: Today's "Compromise" + Ron Suskind on Torture

If you have a strong stomach, read these.

Update:

For a slightly less (and only slightly) depressing analysis see Steve Gilliard's News Blog:

Politics on a wire

Diebold consultant admits to changing software in 2002 election.

Clammyc at Booman Tribune:
Now, I am not putting on a tin foil hat here, as we have seen over the past few weeks how easy it is for the Diebold machines to be altered and hacked, but I wanted to point something out from the upcoming article that may get lost in the hullabaloo of RFK Jr. exploring the potential for hacking the 2006 election.

What is interesting here is that the Diebold consultant, Christopher Hood has been outspoken about the good things that Diebold machines can do. He is quoted here talking about voter outreach and also is quoted talking about how many voters have only heard the criticisms of Diebold.

So when he speaks up, I think it lends some credibility, or at least more than someone who has always been a critic. Further, the Raw Story excerpt describes Hood as "an African American whose parents helped fight for voting rights in the South in the 1960s" and was "proud to be promoting Diebold's machines".

But Hood talks of what I would certainly call "funny business" going on in Georgia during August 2002 right before the primaries. Things like software patches that were not approved by the State, directions from Diebold's election unit president to not share information with the county authorities, and early morning changes to machines on (I believe primary) election day.

The company was authorized to put together ballots, program machines and train poll workers across the state - all without any official supervision. "We ran the election," says Hood. "We had 356 people that Diebold brought into the state. Diebold opened and closed the polls and tabulated the votes. Diebold convinced (Georgia Secretary of State Cathy) Cox that it would be best if the company ran everything due to the time constraints, and in the interest of a trouble-free election, she let us do it."

So basically, there was a deal where Diebold had free reign over the entire Georgia election process for 2002. Which included training the workers, setting up the machines, counting the votes, and, well, just about everything else.

And then Diebold's election unit president stepped in and made the story even more interesting:

Then, one muggy day in mid-August, Hood was surprised to see the president of Diebold's election unit, Bob Urosevich, arrive in Georgia from his headquarters in Texas. With the primaries looming, Urosevich was personally distributing a "patch," a little piece of software designed to correct glitches in the computer program. "We were told that it was intended to fix the clock in the system, which it didn't do," Hood says. "The curious thing is the very swift, covert way this was done."

And thanks to the agreement between Cox and Diebold, there was no need to certify the change to the software, since Diebold was pretty much running the election process - at least the administration of it.

Read the entire piece

Will The Next Election Be Hacked?

Robert F. Kennedy jr. in The Rolling Stone:

...Paper ballots will not completely eliminate the threat of tampering, of course - after all, election fraud and miscounts have occurred throughout our history. As long as there has been a paper trail, however, our elections have been conducted with some measure of public scrutiny. But electronic voting machines are a hacker's dream. And today, for-profit companies are being given unprecedented and frightening power not only to provide these machines but to store and count our votes in secret, without any real oversight.

You do not have to believe in conspiracy theories to fear for the integrity of our electoral system: The right to vote is simply too important - and too hard won - to be surrendered without a fight. It is time for Americans to reclaim our democracy from private interests.

Please, read all of this.



Republican Governor Calls for Paper Ballots in November!

Bradblog:

From Page 1 of Thursday's WaPo:

A week after the primary election was plagued by human error and technical glitches, Maryland Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) called yesterday for the state to scrap its $106 million electronic voting apparatus and revert to a paper ballot system for the November election.

"When in doubt, go paper, go low-tech," he said.

Ehrlich said that, if necessary, he would call a special session of the Maryland General Assembly to change the law to allow paper ballots.

The Republican Governor's call comes after hearings today to investigate Maryland's primary election meltdown on September 12th.

Ehrlich had called for paper ballots last February. The Democratic MD House supported the initiative in a 137 to 0 vote. The Democratic Senate let the bill die without a vote before ending their session.

More

Go back to paper ballots!

Computerworld:
Avi Rubin is unique in that he is both a professor of computer science who specializes in e-voting security issues and someone who directly participates in the electoral process as a Maryland elections judge. His interest in e-voting began when he co-authored a study of Diebold Election Systems Inc. touch-screen voting software, released in July 2003. Rubin is also the author of Brave New Ballot: The Battle to Safeguard Democracy in the Age of Electronic Voting. The book, released this month, is highly critical of the security of e-voting machines used across the nation. Rubin, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, participated as an election judge in last week's primary in Baltimore County and detailed his experiences in a blog.

This week, Rubin talked with Computerworld about e-voting, last week's elections and his new book. Excerpts from that interview follow:

Continue

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

If Congress has the will to do it. Shrub can't escape justice.

The only way Bush gets a pass is if he is not held accountable. Congress can not whitewash his sins away.

Follow The Existential Cowboy:

Congress is powerless to absolve Bush of capital crimes and torture charges

Bush is in a heap of trouble. The US Congress should be impeaching Bush —NOT conspiring with him to cover his backside!

Whatever torture compromise may work its way through an intimidated Congress, it cannot help Bush. The US Constitution requires nothing less than a Constitutional Amendment to relieve US obligations under the Geneva convention; and, at least one Constitutional provision means that nothing legal can get Bush off the hook for the crimes that he has already committed.

Let's take the second one first. Bush seeks an ex post facto law that will make legal —after the fact —his violations of the Geneva Convention having to do with torture.

No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

—US Constitution, Article I

Continue reading

Help with the 'Let America Vote Bill'.

Brad at Bradblog:

[...] My concern right now — this late in the game — is simply to assure that voters who show up at the polls and are legally registered to vote, may actually be able to cast a vote at all!

In primary after primary this year, voters have been told to "come back later" or, at best, given a provisional ballot (which may or may not ever be counted) when voting machines either failed to work or, frequently, weren't even present by the time voters showed up to vote. That is voter disenfranchisement, pure and simple, and it affects voters of any and all political stripes.

Common sense (one would think) would dictate that State and County Election Directors would mandate Emergency Paper Ballots for voters to use in the event of machine unavailability. Though the Secretaries of State in several states so far this year (Texas, Arkansas, etc.) have issued emergency orders for such Emergency Paper Ballots, remarkably, many states and counties didn't bother and thousands of legally registered voting citizens were sent home in the bargain.

The legislation required by Congress to mandate Emergency Paper Ballots (I call it the "LET AMERICA VOTE ACT") is incredibly simple. In yesterday's article, I included a three-sentence piece of legislation. Below, is a more fully-formed draft legislation based on those three sentences as sent to me orginally by Bob Wilson of the Illinois Ballot Integrity Project.

Along with additional tweaks by myself and a few others, my complete suggested legislation can be read — in it's entirety — in about 30 seconds. It's posted in full below.

If Congress cares (and if you help them to do so!), I'm quite certain that this measure can be passed by both houses of Congress and signed by George W. Bush with Terri Schiavo-like speed.

I'd think our democracy is worth at least as much. And I know it's certainly worth trying for!


Read all

What happens when Bush Iraqs Iran?

Taylor Martin at Firedoglake:

Looking at the civil war in Iraq, it’s hard to imagine what would (will) happen if (when) George W. Bush turns his talents on Iran. If we think we’ve got problems now — and we do — going into Iran would make the bombs bursting in Baghdad seem like firecrackers at a football game.

Sam Gardiner has put together a fascinating and chilling report talking about what will happen once Bush and the Republicans turn their military sights and lack of planning on Iran. According to his official bio, Gardiner is a "retired U.S. Air Force colonel who has taught strategy and military operations at the National War College, Air War College, and Naval War College". He also did some war gaming on Iran, which James Fallows covered for the Atlantic Monthly.

[...]

As Gardiner stipulates, not even the experts know how Iran will react. But you can sure make educated guesses at some of the consequences of Bush striking Iran. Gardiner does just that and none of it’s good, because there are no good military options on this one.

The Iranians would likely look to target Israel as a response to a U.S. strike, using Hezbollah as the primary vehicle for retaliation. …

Moqtada al-Sadr has said publicly that if the United States were to attack Iran, he would target U.S. forces in Iraq.

Iran could channel more individuals and weapons into Iraq. …

Moqtada al-Sadr controls the large Facilities Protection Service forces in Iraq. Some estimates put this force as large as 140,000. … read on

There is a lot at stake right now, but the trouble is, according to Gardiner, the game has already begun. I wonder how many people in Congress know?

More


I'm sure glad that the GOP supports our troops, who sacrifice for us. ...Oh, wait.

Think Progress:

Conservative Congressman Blocking Crackdown on Predatory Lenders Targeting U.S. Troops

...A Pentagon report last month found that as many one in five U.S. service members “are being preyed on by loan centers set up near military bases” that can charge interest of 400 percent or more. Increasingly, soldiers have debt levels so high they are barred from serving overseas; others suffer from “bankruptcies, divorces and ruined careers.” (More facts HERE.)

[...]

The Pentagon has joined consumer, military, and veterans groups in backing a bipartisan amendment from Sens. Jim Talent (R-MO) and Bill Nelson (D-FL) that places a cap of 36 percent on high interest rates for short-term payday loans to military members.

But one conservative congressman, Rep. Geoff Davis (R-KY), is trying to gut the amendment. Davis has proposed his own language — praised by the payday lending industry — that sets no real limits on predatory lenders. One of Davis’s aides admitted last week that he consulted on the legislation with “CNG Financial of Mason, Ohio, one of his top campaign donors and owner of national payday lender Check ‘n Go.”

More



My tinfoil hat continues to tingle.

Robert Scheer: Gaping Holes in the 9/11 Narrative

What we still don’t know about 9/11 could kill us. By “we” I mean the public that has been kept in the dark for five years by a president who may know the truth but has chosen to ignore it. Instead of grappling with the thorny origins of that disaster, George Bush willfully turned the nation’s attention and resources to a totally unrelated and disastrous imperial adventure in Iraq.

Just how unrelated was definitively established last Friday with the belated release of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s second report, which concluded that there not only was zero connection between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, but that Iraq was the one country in the region where Osama bin Laden could not operate.

[...]

Recall that the predominant excuse for invading Iraq was the claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and would be willing to pass them on to rogue regimes and terrorists. Not only were such weapons not found, but the evidence from the accounts of former administration insiders and the Senate Intelligence Committee makes clear that the administration was consciously cherry-picking the evidence to shore up its fraudulent case.

There were weapons of mass destruction being shipped to “rogue nations,” but they were coming from Pakistan in an extensive program headed by Abdul Qadeer (A.Q.) Khan, the father of the “Islamic bomb.” The Pakistan government has admitted that Khan passed on to North Korea, Libya and Iran technical know-how and vital materials for the creation of nuclear weapons. But Khan was pardoned of any crimes by Pakistan’s dictator general, President Gen. Pervez Musharraf. Khan is restricted only by a loose form of house arrest and has never been made available to U.S. investigators. Yet the Bush administration dropped the sanctions originally imposed on Pakistan in reprisal for its development of nuclear weapons in return for Pakistan’s support in the “war on terror.”

[...]

the most cited source that we have on what happened on 9/11, the much celebrated 9/11 Commission Report, was stage-managed by the Bush administration, just as it has controlled and distorted so much other information.

In light of that sorry record of the propagandistic exploitation of the 9/11 tragedy for partisan political purpose, is it any wonder that large numbers of Americans have doubts about all of it and that a considerable industry of documentaries and investigative reports has sprung up with alternative theories ranging from the plausible to the absurd?

Read the entire story




And People Call Me a Pessimist

Bilmon at Whiskey Bar:

Apparently on the theory that misery always appreciates good company, several readers have directed me to this article about British scientist James Lovelock and his warning that catastrophic global climate change is both imminent and unstoppable:

Within the next decade or two, Lovelock forecasts, Gaia will hike her thermostat by at least 10 degrees. Earth, he predicts, will be hotter than at any time since the Eocene Age 55 million years ago, when crocodiles swam in the Arctic Ocean.

"There's no realization of how quickly and irreversibly the planet is changing," Lovelock says. "Maybe 200 million people will migrate close to the Arctic and survive this. Even if we took extraordinary steps, it would take the world 1,000 years to recover."

C'mon Jim, give it to us without the sugar coating. We can take it.

[...]

if Lovelock is right, Greenland could end up being the Florida of the 22nd century -- in which case I'm sure future generations of the Bush family will find a way to screw it up, too.

Actually, if Lovelock's "Gaia Hypothesis" is correct, and the planet really does act like one big self-regulating organism, then what's coming won't be the end of life on earth, but rather the fever that kills the germs (think of the human race as a particularly nasty yeast infection) and restores the patient to her former health.

I hope Mother Earth will forgive me if I don't send her a get-well-soon card.

Continue

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

The Rule of Law or the Rule of Bush?

Stephen D. at Booman Tribune:
People I know, conservatives mostly, but also the odd independent, often ask me (and I'm paraphrasing here in the interest of civility) "I know Bush has screwed things up royally, but why should I vote for Democrats instead of Republicans for Congress?" Now there are a myriad of responses to that question, but I'd like to focus on just one for the moment. It's one of my standard rejoinders to these types of queries, and because I have a fondness for the Socratic method, I phrase it in the form of another question. I simply say this:

Which do you prefer: The Rule of Law or the Rule of Bush?

At this point I usually receive a blank stare in return, followed, after a brief pause as my interrogator gathers his or her wits, by a third question: "What the hell are you talking about?"

So I tell them ...

Read the rest

My tinfoil is all a tingle!

One of the documentaries mentioning charges in the buildings is 'Loose Change' (1 hr. 22 min.)

Liz at Blondsense:
Did anyone notice this part of bush's press conference on Friday?
[...]

For example, Khalid Sheik Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people.

He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."
Things just get stranger and stranger. More

Another suppressed FCC study. Just how many are there?

How about one final study? Of the FCC?

Josh Silver at Huffington:

Here we go again.

Another Federal Communications Commission study on the negative impacts of media consolidation came to light Monday after being buried at the agency for at least two years -- the second suppressed FCC ownership study to surface in as many weeks.

It's clear that FCC's top brass are willing to deep-six any research that contradicts the media industry's pro-consolidation claims.

In fine bureaucratic fashion, neither former Chairman Michael Powell nor current Chairman Kevin Martin has accepted responsibility for the alleged cover-up. In the minds of both of them, it's better we all forget about it so the FCC can return to its work of handing out billions of dollars in monopoly privileges to massive media firms.

The recently spiked study, a "Review of the Radio Industry" conducted by the FCC Media Bureau, found that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had led to a drastic decline in the number of radio station owners -- even as the actual number of commercial stations in the United States had increased.

A copy of the study is available at http://www.stopbigmedia.com/files/radio_ownership.pdf
Although the study would have been the fifth of its kind since the 1996 Act -- which lifted national radio ownership caps -- it was never released, and no subsequent studies on the topic have been conducted. It only became public after a copy was leaked to the office of Sen. Barbara Boxer.

Last week, Jonathan Rintels reported here that Boxer also uncovered a buried federal study that showed media consolidation is harmful to local news reporting. The 2004 report found that locally owned stations produced - on average -- five minutes more local news coverage in a half-hour newscast than their consolidated competitors.

Upon seeing the results, senior managers at the FCC ordered that "every last piece" of that study be destroyed, according to the Associated Press.

Continued here



Monday, September 18, 2006

Besides the previous post there's this.

October surprize, anyone?

Booman Tribune:

US Navy Told to Prepare to Blockade Iran

It's looking more and more as if Bush's October surprise really will be war with Iran. From the current edition of TIME magazine:

The first message was routine enough: a "Prepare to Deploy" order sent through naval communications channels to a submarine, an Aegis-class cruiser, two minesweepers and two mine hunters. The orders didn't actually command the ships out of port; they just said to be ready to move by Oct. 1. But inside the Navy those messages generated more buzz than usual last week when a second request, from the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), asked for fresh eyes on long-standing U.S. plans to blockade two Iranian oil ports on the Persian Gulf. The CNO had asked for a rundown on how a blockade of those strategic targets might work. When he didn't like the analysis he received, he ordered his troops to work the lash up once again.

Need I remind anyone that a naval blockade is considered an act of war?

Continue

One day Bush is going to unite another "Coalition of the Willing". Unfortunately, the US will be on the wrong end of it

I hope this is untrue. But I know that it is most likely correct.

Crooks and Liars:
Retired Col. Sam Gardiner says we’re in Iran right now

Col. Sam Gardiner says the US is already conducting military operations in Iran and a plan has been forwarded up to the White House. He broached this topic a few months back. (Updated with full transcript)

Video-WMP Video-QT

Gardiner: We’re conducting military operations inside Iran right now. The evidence is overwhelming. From both the Iranians, Americans, and from Congressional sources.

Gardiner: The plan has gone to the White House. That’s not normal planning. When the plan goes to the White House, that means we’ve gone to a different state.

The Agonist has more

On April 15th, 2006, Sam revealed "Bush’s Secret War on Iran"

GARDINER: Sure. Actually, Jim, I would say — and this may shock some — I think the decision has been made and military operations are under way. (full transcript)

Digby writes:

"Colonel Sam Gardiner is the retired colonel who taught at the National War College, the Air War College and the Naval Warfare College and who found more than 50 instances of demonstrably false stories planted in the press in the run up to the war, back in 2003. He was just on CNN:read on"

Go ahead read the whole sorry mess.

Paranoids are sometimes right.

From Seeing The Forrest:

Letter to Josh Marshall on the October Surprise

(I'm responding to this story.)

Josh,

I have been dreading the October Surprise since March. I said then that the Democrats should be pre-positioning themselves to react effectively if this happened, and should loudly warn against it whenever the trial balloons went up. The Democrats did not do this; the party as a whole is still following DLC Rule One: "We can't be seen as doves".

This is what the bad guy meant when he said "We make reality, we don't respond to reality". Hot war in Iran is capable of erasing the Republican Congressional polling deficits overnight. I don't say it will certainly succeed, it's probably about a 50/50 shot, but it's the only move Bush has left. Whether it succeeds or not depends partly on whether the Democrats as a team respond effectively to whatever he does, and I doubt that they are able to do that.

Continue reading



I guess some Texan is set to make a pile on emissions control. Shrub couldn't possibly be doing this because it's the right thing to do.

From The Independent:

Bush 'prepares emissions U-turn'

By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor

President Bush is preparing an astonishing U-turn on global warming, senior Washington sources say.

[...]

Administration insiders privately refer to the planned volte-face as Mr Bush's "Nixon goes to China moment", recalling how the former president amazed the world after years of refusing to deal with its Communist regime. Hardline global warming sceptics, however, are already publicly attacking the plans.

[...]

Over the past few days rumours swept the capital that the "Toxic Texan" would announce his conversion this week, in an attempt to reduce the impact of a major speech tomorrow by Al Gore on solutions to climate change.

[...]

...Iain Murray, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Mr Bush's chief climate change cheerleader, is deeply alarmed: "We are left with the unpleasant conclusion that the only motivation is political."

More

FCC Destroyed Media Ownership Report

Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting:

FCC Destroyed Media Ownership Report

Study found local ownership means more local news

9/15/06

A 2004 Federal Communications Commission study that showed locally owned television stations provide more local news than others was ordered destroyed by FCC officials, and only came to light this week when a copy was leaked to Sen. Barbara Boxer (D.-Calif.).

[...]

Boxer has called on the FCC's inspector general to conduct a formal, independent investigation into the suppression of the study. As the FCC revisits its ownership rules once again, transparency and a true commitment to the public interest are vital.


More

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Vote Absentee! Finally, the MSM finds it possible that there is a BIG problem with the new electronic voting machines.

My Left Wing:
It's happening. The national tide is turning. The Washington Post has come out with a major article on possible e-voting irregularities in the November elections--especially in the wake of the Maryland debacle.

And, amazingly enough, a link to the article is featured right now on the Drudge Report, ensuring its dissemination to million of wingers and moderates around the country.

Combine this with the ever-more prominent Princeton-Diebold story all over the the cable networks, and there's absolutely no question that this issue is going to reach a nexus in the American consciousness.

[...]

The tide is turning. The American people are waking up. Even the right-wingers can't dodge this issue anymore--and November elections are going to be UGLY.

Let's keep up the pressure on this issue, and support the traditional media--and yes, even the GOP propagandists--that have now finally been dragged kicking and screaming to actually deal with it. Keep the focus.

As for what each of us can do, it's very simple: Encourage each and every one of your friends and family members to vote Absentee. There's no guarantee their votes will be counted otherwise.

Much more



Thanks Generalissimo George, we REALLY needed that.

Existentialist Cowboy:

How Bush made of the last remaining superpower a banana republic

Nothing said by Bush about Iraq has been true. Nothing said by Bush about 911 has been true. Nothing said by Bush about the "war on terrorism" has been true. All are lies.

[...]

The Middle East is not merely aflame it is destabilized. Three civil wars rage in Iraq and American troops are caught in the cross fire. Credible sources support the conclusion that the world has very narrowly averted World War III. Bush gave Ehud Olmert a green light to attack Hebollah on the pretext of avenging the alleged kidnapping of Israeli soldiers inside Israel. Oddly, however, the story changed in later versions. The original AP story stated that the soldiers in question were captured inside Lebanon —not Israel. Who attacked who? Bush, meanwhile, urged Olmert to attack Syria. By that time, Olmert must have seen a debacle in the making and refused to take the bait. An attack on Syria would most certainly have been intended to draw Iran into the conflict. World War III? Possibly! Was Bush trying to start it? Possibly!

[...]

The world is sick and tired of this mountebank, this demagogue, this poser, this fraud who dares to threaten the world. Billions the world over have seen the naked emperor and called his bluff. Billions have had enough of a talent-less mediocrity who dares to lecture his betters.

That Bush may have no regrets about Iraq says more about Bush's pathology than it does about the cause, if cause there be for mass murder, war crimes, oil theft, and lies. Bush has no regrets because he is utterly without humanity or empathy. Thousands have died for Bush's vainglorious dreams of conquest and military glory. The attack and invasion of Iraq, a sovereign nation, was and remains a war crime. It was Dr. Gustav Gilbert, the allies Nuremberg psychologist, who said that evil is an utter lack of empathy. That is a perfect description of the man who usurped the White House and made of this last remaining superpower nothing more than a banana republic.

Read all

A defining moment for America

WTF is it Now:
How very special! We, as Americans, should be so proud.... wait, what???
The president goes to Capitol Hill to lobby for torture.

[Preznit Flopsweat McFartypants] rarely visits Congress. So it was a measure of his painfully skewed priorities that Mr. Bush made the unaccustomed trip yesterday to seek legislative permission for the CIA to make people disappear into secret prisons and have information extracted from them by means he dare not describe publicly.
Didn't Saddam do almost the same thing? Isn't that why are troops are dying in Iraq? Doesn't this make us just as bad as those terrist-loving countries?
My only comment is see the previous post